After setting a women's record for the Everest Marathon, Angela Mudge, Scotland's world hill-running champion, described the experience as the most challenging of her career.
The 37-year-old, who has had a lifetime of fighting the odds - she was born with her feet facing the wrong way - completed the course in 5hr 3min, knocking a remarkable 13 minutes off the 10-year-old women's record held by Anne Stentiford, of Macclesfield Harriers, as she finished in eighth place overall.
While she might have been expected to be better prepared than most for the challenge - she recently retained the world sky-running title contested in a year-long series of marathons at altitude - her time, more than double the world record for the marathon at sea level, demonstrates just how tough the race was.
The scale of the challenge was further demonstrated by the experience of her fellow- Scot, Louise Murray, who came close to being ruled out of the race midway through the two-week preparation trek that competitors are obliged to undertake to reach Everest base camp if they want to compete.
The 30-year-old Scot, spends half her year working above 2000m (6500ft) in the French Alps, yet had a traumatic night after suffering intense pain around her eyes on top of a severe headache in Gokyo, at 4800m, a week before the race. They are classic symptoms of acute mountain sickness, as fluid starts to collect in the brain.
She was given oxygen, steroids and placed in a portable hyperbaric pressure chamber under the supervision of her boyfriend, Jamie, while a porter would blow more air into the chamber at five-minute intervals to keep it at the right pressure.
Next morning, she was helped down the valley and made a rapid recovery as her blood oxygen level returned to something approaching normal. Remarkably she completed the marathon a week later, in under eight hours.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article