We live in the age of spin and that applies as much to local as national government.
That is the obvious conclusion, as Barnet Council had again set about discrediting a report it doesn't like from Government inspectors.
The latest example, reported in Notebook last week, was the Audit Commission's unflattering verdict on Barnet's refuse and street cleaning operations.
A few months back we had another critical report from a team of Government inspectors, this time into Barnet's measures against benefit fraud.
The traditional response to such reports is to have a little public hand-wringing before announcing "yes, we've had some problems, but we are now improving dramatically". And it is often true as in this case that the inspection took place more than a year ago, and things may have got a bit better since then.
But Barnet has taken the aggressive line that both reports are largely inaccurate and grossly unfair. And then goes on to claim that, in fact, the council is running quite a good operation.
I think it is only in the last few years that local politicians have had the neck to try and discredit critical reports from Government inspections teams. It shows the politicians' increasing belief in the powers of spin.
Another important issue has been highlighted by the critical report on the refuse service.
And this is the extent to which the Conservative opposition has been sidelined. It is something Notebook has commented on before. Indeed the new cabinet system has succeeded in sidelining councillors of all parties.
The first the Tories knew that the report had been published and the council was attacking it was when contacted by the press for comment.
The official explanation is that it was all a last minute rush; the report was received by the council on the afternoon of Friday, February 2 when the Director of Environmental Services was away, and it was not possible to brief councillors before publishing a response.
Whatever rush there may have been it is remarkable the council simply forgot or ignored the entire opposition.
Tory opposition leader Victor Lyon is infuriated by the episode and drew Notebook's attention to the fact that minutes show the cabinet was talking about a draft version of the report back in October!
He takes the view that he should have been shown the report at this stage. The report had been handled in an undemocratic way he declared. The opposition had been denied the opportunity to respond promptly to what was a financial scandal with loses of more than £1million.
This was money which was desperately needed elsewhere in a borough with crumbling schools and roads.
In what was not the best of weeks for Barnet Council, the critical report on refuse collection and street cleaning had another unfortunate consequence.
It cost the council its much coveted Beacon Status award.
As Notebook students will know, the council leadership has an obsession to win this accolade from the Government.
After considerable effort Barnet was one of 43 councils short-listed for an award this year. In fact Barnet's award was to be for "maintaining a quality environment".
But following the publication of the Audit Commission report, the Government changed its mind and Barnet's name was struck out at the last minute.
You may take it that there are some badly bruised political egos at the town hall this week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article