SCHOOLS Minister Maureen Watt must be relieved that the use of Lochgelly's finest manufactured item, the tawse, has been banned from use in this country, otherwise she might have found herself summoned to the office of headmaster Salmond for six of the best.
The pledge to ensure that children get two hours a week of PE lessons has sparked a bruising debate for all sides. It was the issue which last month led to Wendy Alexander embarrassingly running out of questions. Alex Salmond had responded: “Reports over the weekend that we intend to scrap the existing targets are completely unfounded,” which prompted the Labour leader to say: “I have no further questions.”
But now the curse of PE has come back to haunt the Nationalists, who were in difficulties this week after Ms Watt claimed during a radio interview that the extra two hours of PE might include the walk to a from schools. While it is all very well to wish to see the end of the queues of Chelsea tractors outside schools dropping off and picking up the little dears, the walk would scarcely amount to a PE lesson. Kids would only have to live a 12-minute walk from the school for their return journey to amount to the whole two hours.
Mr Salmond was quick to correct her, insisting that the two hours would be within the school day and would indeed involve expert tuition. Ms Watt, he said, had mixed up a general commitment to increased physical activity with the specific commitment on physical education. But for all the talk of an additional £40m committed to the subject, question marks remain over the training and retention of sufficient PE teachers.
“We don't do slapping down in this administration,” said the FM. I very much doubt that and I think we can expect the schools minister to be better briefed on this issue in the future. I just hope she covered up her wrists – that's where the tawse really hurt, as I recall.
----------------------------
As I write Gordon Brown will be putting the finishing touches to his very own Sermon on the Mound. I'll probably watch his address to the Kirk's General Assembly on television tomorrow, but if he uses the phrase “moral compass” I'll stage my very own walk out from my living room.
Margaret Thatcher outraged the Commissioners a generation ago, not by claiming there was “no such thing as society” (that was a different speech), but by her homily on: “If a man will not work, he shall not eat.” The Moderator that day, the Very Rev. James Whyte, was later to say: “She confuses the creation of wealth with the making of money.
“Wealth is created by those who take something of no value and make it into something of great value. It's created by craftsmen, by people who work in industry. The shuffling around of shares in order to make yourself a fortune in a fortnight is not wealth creation, it's just money-making. She doesn't seem to know the difference.”
Will the current Prime Minister?
-----------------------------------------
A colleague here in the press tower bought a set of silver cuff-links from the Scottish Parliament shop recently, in the form of the MSPs' “think-pod” windows, complete with representations of the wooden spars in front of them. At the second time of wearing them the cuff-links disintegrated, with the spars falling off. Today Press Association reports that all around the parliament complex these strange adornments are having to be repaired, so in a strangely voodoo way the cuff-links were perfectly realistic!
Robbie
Can you expand on the nature of the 'comment board' closures
Namely, the extent & specific nature of the complaints.
I am concerned that certain posters are attempting to close down debate and criticism on issues of importance to Scottish Politics an seek reassurance that the Herald is acting in a fair way and is not being adversely taken advantage of by these posters.
I would cite the Scotsman's comment boards which frequently descend into quite bitter postings but which appear to be continuously moderated to free up the 'trolling' nature of these posters.
Greater transparency on this issue would be helpful
Robbie
Can you expand on the nature of the 'comment board' closures
Namely, the extent & specific nature of the complaints.
I am concerned that certain posters are attempting to close down debate and criticism on issues of importance to Scottish Politics an seek reassurance that the Herald is acting in a fair way and is not being adversely taken advantage of by these posters.
I would cite the Scotsman's comment boards which frequently descend into quite bitter postings but which appear to be continuously moderated to free up the 'trolling' nature of these posters.
Greater transparency on this issue would be helpful
wardog
I am trying to gain support for a buy the herald day to show the herald how much circulation they are losing out on due to their editorial policy and the fact that comments are closed.
Any suggestions for a day and date for all snp supporters to buy the herald. I figure if every snp supporter and activist follows this then we may increase the heralds circulation in one day by quite a significant factor thereby showing them how much readers they are losing. This is kind of a protest buy. Rather than a boycott.
wardog
I am trying to gain support for a buy the herald day to show the herald how much circulation they are losing out on due to their editorial policy and the fact that comments are closed.
Any suggestions for a day and date for all snp supporters to buy the herald. I figure if every snp supporter and activist follows this then we may increase the heralds circulation in one day by quite a significant factor thereby showing them how much readers they are losing. This is kind of a protest buy. Rather than a boycott.
Posted by: Strathturret at 11:21am on Mon 19 May 08
karin,
that's a clever (and positive idea). I read the Scotsman for 32 years and finally stopped taking it regularly at end of 04. I have read Herald for many years and I still find the Herald/SH the best Scottish newspapers. I feel we have to support the Herald despite views expressed about Alf and Douglas.
How about Friday 30th May.
karin,
that's a clever (and positive idea). I read the Scotsman for 32 years and finally stopped taking it regularly at end of 04. I have read Herald for many years and I still find the Herald/SH the best Scottish newspapers. I feel we have to support the Herald despite views expressed about Alf and Douglas.
thats not going to give us much time strathturret to get the news out to every snp supporter. Do you have any suggestions how to contact everyone on that timescale i was thinking more of a month from now? with reminders every day or week?
What do you think?
anyone else any suggestions?
thats not going to give us much time strathturret to get the news out to every snp supporter. Do you have any suggestions how to contact everyone on that timescale i was thinking more of a month from now? with reminders every day or week?
wardog
I am trying to gain support for a buy the herald day to show the herald how much circulation they are losing out on due to their editorial policy and the fact that comments are closed.
Any suggestions for a day and date for all snp supporters to buy the herald. I figure if every snp supporter and activist follows this then we may increase the heralds circulation in one day by quite a significant factor thereby showing them how much readers they are losing. This is kind of a protest buy. Rather than a boycott.
wardog
I am trying to gain support for a buy the herald day to show the herald how much circulation they are losing out on due to their editorial policy and the fact that comments are closed.
Any suggestions for a day and date for all snp supporters to buy the herald. I figure if every snp supporter and activist follows this then we may increase the heralds circulation in one day by quite a significant factor thereby showing them how much readers they are losing. This is kind of a protest buy. Rather than a boycott.
Karin at 12:06pm today
Hello Karin, lucky I caught this post - the extent of the censorship on the other story's led me here! ;-)
Sounds good idea to me, let's get a typical post together, maybe boycott Scotsman and but herald to show power of support.........how about staging it on [bold]4th July 2008 - Independence Day[/bold]
To Robbie, hopefully you will give this notion some publicity in an effort to expose both the problems with the comments page but also the power of free comment.
A moderator team wouldn't cost the herald too much surely.
Karin at 12:06pm today
Hello Karin, lucky I caught this post - the extent of the censorship on the other story's led me here! ;-)
Sounds good idea to me, let's get a typical post together, maybe boycott Scotsman and but herald to show power of support.........how about staging it on 4th July 2008 - Independence Day
To Robbie, hopefully you will give this notion some publicity in an effort to expose both the problems with the comments page but also the power of free comment.
A moderator team wouldn't cost the herald too much surely.
Posted by: jim mitchell at 4:37pm on Mon 19 May 08
Robbie, some clarification please as to why the Herald is being subjective as to what stories can be commented on and how it would seem to be those where unionist partys especially Labour could be criticised
Robbie, some clarification please as to why the Herald is being subjective as to what stories can be commented on and how it would seem to be those where unionist partys especially Labour could be criticised
A lot of folk will have disappeared on holiday by the 4th of JUly.
What about TUesday 24th JUne - anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn?
Slainte Mhor
A lot of folk will have disappeared on holiday by the 4th of JUly.
What about TUesday 24th JUne - anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn?
Slainte Mhor
Posted by: jim mitchell at 6:02pm on Mon 19 May 08
Karin etc, re the protest suggestions, wouldn't it make more sense to make sur ethat everybody buys the Sunday Herald, which seems to be unbiased, instead of putting more money into the coffers of the Week-day Herald, which is seen as being biased toward unionism.
The more one goes up whilst he other goes down might serve to nake the point more forcibly!
Although to be honest I am, not sure how effective these protests are.
Karin etc, re the protest suggestions, wouldn't it make more sense to make sur ethat everybody buys the Sunday Herald, which seems to be unbiased, instead of putting more money into the coffers of the Week-day Herald, which is seen as being biased toward unionism.
The more one goes up whilst he other goes down might serve to nake the point more forcibly!
Although to be honest I am, not sure how effective these protests are.
Posted by: Strathturret at 8:41am on Tue 20 May 08
I like ideas of Bannockburn anniversary! Tuesday 24th June.
Sunday Herald and Herald are same company so favouring one is irrelevant.
Will Herald print extra copies on 24Th?
Robbie any views?
I like ideas of Bannockburn anniversary! Tuesday 24th June.
Sunday Herald and Herald are same company so favouring one is irrelevant.
right okay folks we appear to have two good dates for the buy the herald protest day to show the herald how much revenue they are losing due to their editorial policy of supporting labour and therefore unionism.
The dates are
[bold]4th of JUly. independence day[/bold]
(i personally like this although as spagan said lots of people may be on holiday)
[bold]Tuesday 24th JUne - anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn?[/bold]
ST andrews day was also put forward but that is quite a while away?
any more thoughts anyone? i.e. preference for a one of these days or how we can make this more successful or get the word out?
right okay folks we appear to have two good dates for the buy the herald protest day to show the herald how much revenue they are losing due to their editorial policy of supporting labour and therefore unionism.
The dates are
4th of JUly. independence day
(i personally like this although as spagan said lots of people may be on holiday)
Tuesday 24th JUne - anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn?
ST andrews day was also put forward but that is quite a while away?
any more thoughts anyone? i.e. preference for a one of these days or how we can make this more successful or get the word out?
I just thought of soemthing.
You know the SNP are proposing to introduce their referendum bill in Burns Birthday in 2010, January 25th, with a view to having the referendum later in the summer, probably after the latest date for a General Election in May 2010.
Anyone care to have a flutter that the referendum will be held on the 4th July to coincide with the United States Declaration of Independence?
[bold]Independence Day[/bold]
I just thought of soemthing.
You know the SNP are proposing to introduce their referendum bill in Burns Birthday in 2010, January 25th, with a view to having the referendum later in the summer, probably after the latest date for a General Election in May 2010.
Anyone care to have a flutter that the referendum will be held on the 4th July to coincide with the United States Declaration of Independence?