logo
   Web Issue 3186 July 6 2008   
spacer




Farepak savings club chiefs may face court over collapse
TORCUIL CRICHTON, Chief UK political correspondentMay 13 2008

The directors of Farepak, the Christmas savings club that collapsed in 2006 leaving thousands without a penny, could face prosecution, the Consumer Minister suggested yesterday.

An investigation by the Companies Investigations Branch (CIB) of the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform is complete and ministers are taking advice on whether a prosecution can be mounted.

To the anger of MPs who campaigned on behalf of customers who lost their Christmas savings, the report will not be made public ahead of any legal action.

In a written ministerial statement, Gareth Thomas said that the CIB was taking advice on whether its evidence warranted legal action and promised the findings would be published if a court case went ahead.

He said: "If proceedings are taken against any party involved, this will become public knowledge if or when the case reaches open court.

"We will do everything in our power to process this quickly."

The investigation had taken longer than expected because it involved gathering information from Farepak and other companies which were in administration.

Mr Thomas added: "The report is over 700 pages long and could lead to court proceedings, so taking short cuts in the investigation was not an option."

Meanwhile, the liquidators of the company are to sue the former directors to obtain more money for the Farepak creditors.

Some 150,000 families lost about £40 million savings when the Swindon-based firm went into administration in October 2006. Creditors, including customers, are expected to get about 5p in every pound returned.

Jim Devine, the Livingston MP who was at the forefront of the consumer campaign, said he would be "very surprised" if there were no prosecutions as a result of the collapse and called for the report to be published in full.

Mr Devine said: "It is totally unacceptable - 123,000 families were affected by this and people have a right to know what has happened to their money."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: Politically-incorrec t Man, Glasgow on 12:45am Tue 13 May 08
To suggest that the delay in reporting was to ensure thoroughness is facile; that a report paid for by public money will be suppressed if no court action is taken is a disgrace.

I for one am fed up of information on various topics being suppressed by these control-freaks.

I smell whitewash or is it doggie doo-doo?
Posted by: Wardog, Buckie on 2:34am Tue 13 May 08
FAO THE HERALD

Can the Herald explain why comments are being continual banned from story's relating to Wendy Alexander.

Can you confirm/deny rumours that Scottish Labour are making complaints to the Herald to try and minimise open discussion and criticism of her policies?

I think the blogging community on these threads really deserves some kind of explanation here.

Wardog
Posted by: Jimbo on 3:11am Tue 13 May 08
Wardog wrote:
FAO THE HERALD Can the Herald explain why comments are being continual banned from story's relating to Wendy Alexander. Can you confirm/deny rumours that Scottish Labour are making complaints to the Herald to try and minimise open discussion and criticism of her policies? I think the blogging community on these threads really deserves some kind of explanation here. Wardog
Hi Wardog,

maybe they're trying to help out, and increase, the online comments on the Hootsman site. I hear the Hootsman is having problems getting advertisers. The more hits they get online the more online adverts they can get.

They must know that by banning us here, we'll all go over there.
Posted by: Toophingers, Bellshill. on 10:40am Tue 13 May 08
The directors of Farepak COULD face prosecution.
If there was any justice left in Nu Lavatory Britain they WOULD face prosecution.
Posted by: stonehaven on 11:32am Tue 13 May 08
Wardog wrote:
FAO THE HERALD Can the Herald explain why comments are being continual banned from story's relating to Wendy Alexander. Can you confirm/deny rumours that Scottish Labour are making complaints to the Herald to try and minimise open discussion and criticism of her policies? I think the blogging community on these threads really deserves some kind of explanation here. Wardog
Wardog

I have my suspicions that you are correct. Why else woulf the Herald ban comments?
Posted by: spagan, heisker, scotland on 3:23pm Tue 13 May 08
Wardog
I can't believe that in (one of) the oldest democracies in the world, a quality newspaper such as the Herald would ban comment about Wendy, just beacuse of complaints from New Labour's branch office in North Britain.
Farepak
I hope that the government does follow through and prosecute those who took the xmas hamper money and ran (to Argentian etc).
However, even if the Serious Fraud Office acts, I can see it costing a lot of money and achieving little in the way of a result. It may be better for the government to apply pressure on the Financial Services Industry to cough up at least 50% compensation for the people (mainly poor) who lost out.
Slainte Mhor
Posted by: Duns Scotus, The Borders on 4:12pm Tue 13 May 08
Another gaffe for the gaffer!

Top secret memo openly displayed in 10 Downing Street about falling house prices.

http://www.times
online.co.uk/tol/ne
ws/politics/article3

923351.ece
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:




spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use