Torness nuclear power station in East Lothian has faced an emergency shut-down, possibly for several weeks, due to a leaking coolant pipe.
It was claimed the reactor is not affected by the leak, and no radioactive material goes near the ruptured hydrogen pipe, but that plant owners British Energy take measures to shut down the operation completely if there is any concern about the the cooling process.
The shutdown last Saturday, described by a company insider as "not likely to last as long as months", adds to the problems at Hunterston in North Ayrshire which has seen it operating at 70% of its capacity. It feeds concerns about Scotland being able to meet its own electricity demand if it does not have a reliable source of nuclear generation, once Torness and Hunterston are decommissioned. The Ayrshire plant is due to close in 2016 while Torness is scheduled to keep operating until 2023.
The SNP administration, with LibDem support, has set itself against a new generation of nuclear power plants in Scotland. The Westminster government, however, has warned more plants will be necessary to ensure security of power supply.
SNP Lothians MSP Shirley-Anne Somerville commented on the Torness shut-down that the country would be better to focus on developing renewable energy: "This just proves that nuclear power is unreliable and is not delivering our energy needs. We don't need to create a bigger legacy of radioactive waste that burdens future generations."
British Energy is the subject of takeover talks, possibly including the government selling its 35% share.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article