The Scottish Government working group examining how Scotland could get rid of Trident and cope with the jobs impact of its demise met for the first time yesterday.
With SNP policy backing the removal of Trident from the Clyde, ministers have convened a group of experts covering industrial diversification, the legal and moral position of the nuclear deterrent, and local community views.
This group met for the first time yesterday and will meet again this summer to track how their arguments have progressed. Minister for Parliamentary Business Bruce Crawford, who chaired the meeting, said it was "the action of a responsible government" to plan for the consequences of its policies.
Mr Crawford said: "The Scottish Government is opposed to nuclear weapons and it is the action of a responsible government to plan for a scenario where in the future nuclear weapons are no longer based on the Clyde. The Scottish Parliament has voted against a replacement Trident.
"The working group brings together a broad consensus in Scotland and the world, including civic Scotland and our faith communities, which aspires to our nation becoming free of nuclear weapons."
The group includes long-standing anti-nuclear campaigners from the fields of law, academia, faith groups and trade unions.
Among them is Professor William Walker, head of the school of international relations at St Andrews University, and Dr Rebecca Johnson, a former senior adviser to Dr Hans Blix while he investigated claims of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
A senior government aide said the main hope for development was to demonstrate the case against Trident as a jobs generator.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article