John Hutton, Westminster's Business Secretary, yesterday dismissed as "inaccurate and ridiculous" claims he intended to grab planning powers from the Scottish Government so nuclear power stations could be built in Scotland.
Mike Weir, the SNP's energy spokesman at the Commons, raised the issue during questions to the Secretary of State.
The MP for Angus asked Mr Hutton: "Whatever his plans for a new generation of Anglo-French nuclear plants, the minister will be aware that there is a majority in the Scottish Parliament, including many of his own party, who are thoroughly opposed to new nuclear plants. Will the minister take this opportunity to deny weekend reports he is seeking to remove the Scottish Parliament's planning powers in respect to nuclear stations?"
Saying he was "not going to comment on inaccurate and ridiculous press comment", the Business Secretary said: "We've got to think very seriously about energy interdependence within the UK and my concern about the stance that he and his party have taken is that there is a very real danger that that will be compromised.
"It is one thing for SNP politicians to strut around with their rhetoric about nuclear while at the same time continuing to rely on nuclear power generated in the UK."
Mr Weir insisted the minister had ducked the issue. "Mr Hutton was given the opportunity to give a straight answer to a straight question. He refused to give a straight answer, which must raise serious concerns that he is plotting in the background to impose new nuclear plants on an unwilling Scotland."
The SNP back bencher insisted his question was based on the earlier words of Mr Hutton, saying their implication "was clearly that the UK Government may wish to site nuclear power stations in Scotland".
A spokeswoman for Mr Hutton denied this, saying he "respects the devolution settlement and is not seeking to undermine it in any way".
She pointed out the UK's Energy Bill "only related to England and Wales" and said: "There would be little point for John to try to do something else somewhere else when we have not included Scotland in the clause in the bill."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article