Prime Minister Gordon Brown was yesterday urged to give way to mounting calls for an immediate Privy Council inquiry into the origins and conduct of the Iraq war.
Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague said in the Commons there was already a cross-party consensus that such an inquiry would be needed at some point.
But while the government had agreed in principle, it continued to insist it was not appropriate while British troops are still in Iraq.
"The case I wish to put to this House now is that the nation expects, our troops deserve and the facts lead to a fresh conclusion that the time to commence such an inquiry has indeed now been reached," Mr Hague told MPs.
"The passage of time, the urgent need to learn for the future, the need to reinforce the credibility of future decision-taking and the diminished role in Iraq of British forces all point to that clear conclusion."
Foreign Secretary David Miliband insisted an inquiry would be required but not until British troops had finished their work in Iraq. He said: "There is agreement that an inquiry into the Iraq war will be necessary.
"The dispute between us does not concern substance but timing.
"We say - in the words of the Prime Minister on March 19 - the right time to look at these issues and review the lessons learned is when our troops have finished their work in Iraq'."
He added: "The war itself went better than most people expected, but the building of the peace afterwards has gone much worse than people expected."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article