JOHN ASTON
Defence Secretary Des Browne yesterday asked the High Court to outlaw the use of language strongly critical of the MoD in inquest verdicts on soldiers who have died on active service.
The application came in a test case relating to Territorial Army soldier Private Jason Smith, who died of heatstroke in Iraq.
Oxfordshire's assistant deputy coroner, Andrew Walker, recorded in a November 2006 inquest verdict that Private Smith's death was "caused by a serious failure to recognise and take appropriate steps to address the difficulty that he had in adjusting to the climate".
The 32-year-old fell ill in temperatures of 60C (140F) in August 2003 at the al Amara stadium, southern Iraq.
The coroner's narrative verdict described how he was taken to the medical centre at Abu Naji Camp, where he died. The coroner said Private Smith's difficulty in acclimatising to the heat should have been recognised.
The wording of his verdict came under attack at the High Court in London yesterday before Mr Justice Collins.
Sarah Moore, appearing for the Defence Secretary, said the coroner should not have made reference to a "serious failure" to take appropriate steps.
The use of the phrase could be seen as deciding civil liability for Private Smith's death, and that was not allowed under Rule 42 of the 1984 Coroners' Rules, she argued.
Lawyers acting for the late soldier's mother, Mrs Catherine Smith, from Roxburghshire, argue the Defence Secretary's legal challenge was "misconceived".
The judge was told the issue remained important as a new inquest was to be held into Private Smith's death because of flaws in the original hearing.
Ms Moore said "a matter of general importance" had been raised because the phrase "serious failing" was cropping up on a regular basis in inquests into Iraqi military deaths.
Private Smith's family are also making submissions to the court over the scope of the new inquest and asking the judge to order full disclosure of MoD documents, save those covered by public interest immunity.
Wiltshire Coroner David Masters, currently tasked with conducting inquests into many of the deaths of British servicemen in Iraq and Afghanistan, said: "I am unable to make any comment on this particular case.
"Having said that, I do not consider that this will deflect coroners from conducting full, frank and fearless inquiries into the deaths that they are entrusted to investigate - those of people serving their country when they are killed abroad.
"If something needs to be said, I'll say it."
Geoff Webb, coroner's officer for Andrew Walker, said Mr Walker felt it would be inappropriate for him to comment.
Last week, Mr Walker criticised the MoD as he concluded the inquest of a soldier who died in training after plummeting 2500ft at Weston-on-the-Green airfield near RAF Brize Norton on November 17, 2005.
He said SAS trainee Captain Daniel Wright would not have died if he had been equipped with a radio, which would have allowed instructors on the ground to talk him through opening his reserve chute.
Mr Walker said: "Let there be no doubt - this tragedy happened for the want of a simple, inexpensive piece of equipment."
Yesterday, responding to Mr Browne's High Court bid, Capt Wright's mother, Carol, of Newport in South Wales, said: "There is evidence that the MoD try to conceal problems where they exist. If a coroner cannot use what he thinks is appropriate language to describe events - either lack of equipment or proper treatment - then who can?
"Quite honestly, I think Andrew Walker's language is extremely temperate. If the MoD wants not to be criticised, then they should get their house in order and provide our boys and girls with what they need when they need it." She added: "This is a government of control freaks, in my opinion."
In February this year, Mr Walker, at the inquest of Captain James Philippson, accused the MoD of betraying British soldiers' trust by sending them to Afghanistan without basic equipment. Reacting to the MoD legal challenge, Capt Philippson's father, Anthony, of St Albans in Hertfordshire, said yesterday: "In the circumstances, I would have thought Mr Walker's remarks were entirely appropriate. He had just heard how two British Army patrols were totally out-gunned' by a mob of Taliban terrorists."
Capt Philippson, 29, of 7 Parachute Regiment Royal Horse Artillery, died in a fire fight with Taliban troops on June 11, 2006, in which British forces were "totally out-gunned", his inquest heard.
After being told how 7 Para soldiers had complained repeatedly about a lack of standard night-vision kits and weaponry, Mr Walker said: "They (the soldiers) were defeated not by the terrorists but by the lack of basic equipment.
"To send soldiers into a combat zone without basic equipment is unforgivable, inexcusable and a breach of trust between the soldiers and those who govern them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article