Councillors have agreed to postpone the final decision on the controversial bid to build a treetop adventure course in a public park.
The fate of Go Ape's high-wire assault course hangs in the balance after members of Glasgow City Council's planning committee agreed to a request to make an official visit to the site in the North Wood of Pollok Country Park.
They also agreed to a hearing at which campaign group Save Pollok Park will put its case that "noisy" zip slides and rope swings are unsuitable for a peaceful woodland.
The delay was welcomed not only by campaigners, who protested outside the city chambers yesterday, but also by councillors in favour of the proposal. Both sides are confident that visiting the site will persuade the committee of their case.
Bill Fraser, chair man of Pollokshields Community Council, and a member of Save Pollok Park, said: "This is the best outcome we could have hoped for. The site visit will allow members to see what a lovely, quiet, peaceful place the North Wood is."
There have been 148 submissions in favour of Go Ape's proposal, including from Mohammed Sarwar MP.
However, there have also been 881 objections to the course, including from Nicola Sturgeon MSP, the National Trust for Scotland and representatives of the Maxwell family, the ancestral owners of the park.
Many object to the prohibitive cost - £20-25 per person - while others feel that the traffic will overburden the car park and toilet facilities in the Burrell Collection.
Objectors have also complained that the council failed to properly consult park users and local residents.
A council spokeswoman said: "Our efforts to consult with the public and interested organisations went beyond our statutory requirements.
"The consultation was widely advertised and everyone with an opinion was invited."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article