Tory HQ last night branded "outrageous" the prospect of Alistair Darling announcing that he is to keep the £110bn Northern Rock debt off the government balance sheet to protect one of the Chancellor's two golden rules.
The sustainable development rule states that the national debt to GDP ratio should be "prudent" and not go over 40% of national income but, if the nationalised bank's debts were included, the ratio would hit 45%.
In a pre-Budget skirmish, Philip Hammond, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said: "Northern Rock's £110bn liabilities would blow the fiscal rules apart and destroy any shred of credibility the Chancellor has left.
"It will be outrageous if Alistair Darling tries to keep the Northern Rock liabilities off balance sheet when the Office for National Statistics ruled they should be included."
However, a spokeswoman for the Treasury told The Herald that the department had made clear in January that the UK Government's fiscal rules allowed for "temporary and exceptional events", which meant they did not have to go on the balance sheet. She said there would be an update on the policy in next Tuesday's Budget, Mr Darling's first.
Asked to comment on Mr Hammond's remarks, she added: "We are not offering a running commentary on Northern Rock."
Mr Darling is expected to repeat how the UK economy, faced with global turbulence in the face of a credit crunch, is well-placed to weather the storm and also to forecast a slowing of growth this year.
Public sector pay restraint is set to continue to try to keep a lid on inflation so that interest rates can be cut towards the end of the year to generate a feelgood factor ahead of a possible general election in 2009.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article