The future imprisonment of the Lockerbie bomber remains in the hands of the Scottish judiciary and Scottish ministers, even after a deal between Tripoli and the UK Government that could pave the way for his transfer to Libya.
The pledge from Whitehall comes after the two countries' recent agreement on prisoner transfer which specifically says that Scottish authorities have control over the future of prisoners north of the border, without naming the only Libyan held in a Scottish jail, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi.
However, the issue has once again sparked tensions between the Scottish Government and Whitehall, with an accusation by Alex Salmond at the weekend that a £450m deal recently struck between the Libyan government and British-based oil giant BP has been linked to Megrahi's possible transfer from Greenock prison.
The row began in the early weeks of the SNP administration last year, when it emerged Tony Blair had discussed prisoner transfer when still prime minister and visiting Libya, but without consulting Scottish legal authorities.
The SNP asked Whitehall negotiators that the prisoner transfer agreement should specifically exclude Megrahi, but the UK Government found their Tripoli counterparts were not willing to break with convention and create a treaty with reference to a specific convict.
Holyrood ministers are "strongly opposed" to a transfer of Megrahi, convicted of killing 270 people in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie.
A spokesman for Mr Salmond said allegations that Megrahi's future was tied up with the BP deal are "very serious".
A Whitehall source responded last night that it remains the case that Scottish ministers will have the last word on any possible transfer.
While Megrahi appeals his case, he could not be transferred, and, whatever the treaty says, a refusal to transfer could be subject to judicial review under human rights law.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article