A row between Holyrood and Westminster over stop-and-search powers being exercised by British Transport Police has deepened with a strongly-worded attack by a Labour minister on the Scottish Justice Secretary.
Kenny MacAskill has been attacked by Tom Harris, the UK Transport Minister who is also Labour MP for Glasgow South, after the SNP minister had warned the extensive use of anti-terrorist laws for stop-and-search at Scottish railway stations was threatening to undermine good community relations with Scottish-based police. Mr Harris accuses the Justice Secretary of undermining morale and insists he should apologise.
Since the June 30 terror attack on Glasgow Airport, the British Transport Police (BTP) - the only force to be part of a UK-wide service - has carried out nearly 15,000 checks. Of these, 12% on people were counted as being on people from ethnic minorities. Over the past year, the other eight Scottish forces have used these powers fewer than 150 times, and last year only six times.
Mr Harris has written to Mr MacAskill in the strongest language used by a Whitehall minister against a counterpart in the SNP administration over the past seven months, saying it was "unacceptable and inappropriate for anyone in ministerial office to launch such an attack on police officers on the basis of hearsay".
He argued that the vast majority of rail travellers in Scotland feel reassured by the checks rather than threatened, and added: "Your attempts to invoke the prospect of discontent in community relations is cynical and irresponsible". Mr Harris demanded an apology.
He is to go on patrol with BTP officers in Glasgow tomorrow and warned Mr MacAskill: "I hope your ill-judged comments will not succeed in undermining the morale of the men and women of the BTP in Scotland or the confidence that the travelling public should rightly have in them."
Mr MacAskill responded that the public need an explanation why 230 BTP officers carry out so many checks when 16,200 other officers are involved in so few.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article