Holyrood's Audit Committee is to hold an inquiry into the financial and managerial troubles within the Western Isles Health Board, following a report from the Auditor General for Scotland.
Robert Black reported to the committee yesterday that while some improvements had been made, he continued to have significant concerns about the corporate governance arrangements in place at the board.
This was the third consecutive year that he had prepared a report on the accounts of the Western Isles Health Board after it failed to meet targets.
In 2006/07, it recorded a deficit of £880,000, giving a cumulative deficit of £3,364,000.
The latest forecasts are that the board could return an in-year deficit of £300,000 in 2007/08.
Mr Black's report said: "Management capacity may be insufficient to support the measures and initiatives identified as necessary to sustain services. The board had still to show it was able to provide the strong leadership needed to achieve financial recovery."
Hugh Henry, convener of the Audit Committee, said: "The committee is concerned at what is happening with the Western Isles Health Board and has decided to conduct an inquiry into the matters raised by the 2006/07 audit of the board. The committee will be seeking assurances that firm action is being taken to resolve what is clearly an unacceptable situation."
John Angus MacKay, the board's chairman, said: "We will willingly co-operate with this inquiry. An action plan is in place to deal with concerns raised by Audit Scotland."
The inquiry is due to begin early next year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article