logo
   Web Issue 3245 September 6 2008   
spacer




Council ‘facing severe cuts’ amid squeeze on budget
DOUGLAS FRASER, Scottish Political EditorOctober 22 2007

Officials have warned they are planning severe cuts at one local authority as pressure grows on council budgets because of a much tighter spending round.

Council management in Fife have warned of waiting lists involving "significant delays" for social work and children being forced out of residential schools, leading to disruption in mainstream classrooms.

Signs of pressure, particularly on social work budgets, follow major problems that have arisen for the flagship policy of free personal care for the elderly. As budgets are tightened, councils could cut back on such provision for more affluent elderly people, using last week's Court of Session judgment, that found those who arrange their own care in private care homes are not necessarily eligible for the £145-per-week payments.

Councils are currently spending £71m on such people, and have lawyers urgently examining the implications of Lord Macphail's judgment to find out if councils are now legally allowed to cut such payments, and also to examine an uncertainty left by the ruling that they might be legally required to axe them.

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon has sought to reassure elderly people that the ruling need not concern them. However, her reassurance applies only to waiting for personal care as the ruling found against Argyll and Bute Council for operating a waiting list, meaning a delay for elderly people between being assessed as needing personal care and then starting to receive payments for it.

She has also promised the government will honour a commitment to raise the £145 weekly payment from April, six years after it was introduced. It is not clear, however, if that commitment will lead to backdating inflationary rises for those six years, or to start from £145 as a baseline this year.

The latest evidence of budget pressure has been made clear by Fife Council, setting out the potential consequences of its budget forecasts. The authority has suggested it is only the first to put its head above this parapet, but that demographic pressures from growing numbers of elderly people living longer are sure to be putting similar pressures on other councils.

A budget announcement from Finance Secretary John Swinney is due next month that will seek to freeze council tax while expecting councils to cut class sizes and deliver large efficiency gains.

In a paper prepared for councillors, Fife social work officials outlined the prospect of waiting lists being created for care packages for young and old, involving "significant delays between assessment of need and service delivery".

"Prioritisation may result in lower priority cases experiencing significant waiting times and delays in receipt of service," the paper stated.

Those being discharged from hospital could be delayed, causing the knock-on effects for "bed blocking" in hospitals that health boards and councils have spent many millions trying to eliminate.

Hours of support provided by social workers could be cut to bring current delivery into line with lower budgets, while another method of responding to tighter spending would be social worker posts being deliberately left vacant.

The report also warns what would happen if the budget squeeze required children to be moved out of residential schools to their homes or foster carers, leading to problems in the community.


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: Let Me Through I'm a Doctor, Coatbridge on 12:58am Mon 22 Oct 07
Surprise, surprise! The councils will pay for the elderly care. The SNP's election manifesto stated the party would replace PFI schemes and find alternative ways. Now, we read (on the SNP website, no less) that councils will need to take responsibility for new builds, hospitals, houses, community facilities & schools. They will need to look at the options and decide. This is a manouvre Thatcher would have been proud of. Councils will be financially liable for the projects and as we know from the 80's, individual councillors can be bankrupted and removed from office - not by the electorate, but by the courts. This will mean that even worse types (I know it's hard to imagine) will be drawn to serving in councils. When the SNP said they would find alternate ways to build public amenaties, they didn't say they would simply plank the problem onto councils. The councils will be accused of financial mismanagement by the SNP and blamed by the elecorate. The result; more privatisation of public services! Oh dear, the nat chickens are coming home to roost. Salmond boasts he will trim up to £2.7 billion off the council budget by 2011.Result? Mass cuts & job losses across public service. Private companies and charities (usually private companies with charitable status will fill the void. Not what the people had in mind in May.
Posted by: wullie on 3:55am Mon 22 Oct 07
A typical Douglas Fraser article. Kirsty Wark of the Herald?

It's all the Ethenpee's fault!
Posted by: Neil, Aberdeenshire on 5:46am Mon 22 Oct 07
What's up doc?

Councils have always had to pay for capital projects and that hasn't changed. What the SNP said was they'd find alternative ways of financing projects instead of forcing councils to use PFI/PPP.

You can remove your foot from your mouth now, if you want.
Posted by: frank mcbride, lusitania on 8:19am Mon 22 Oct 07
In every LA in Scotland, you could remove 1 in 2 of the Directorate, senior management, area officers and junior management and no-one would notice.

However, when the money saved is reallocated to front line services, the benefits, to both clients/staff and the public at large, will become all too obvious.
Posted by: Jim, Fife on 9:37am Mon 22 Oct 07
"n a paper prepared for councillors, Fife social work officials outlined the prospect of waiting lists being created for care packages for young and old, involving "significant delays between assessment of need and service delivery".
Nothing new here, the Social Work Department in Fife has been a millstone round the necks of tax payers and Council Tax payers for decades.
This department has more managers and hangers on than anyother in Fife, it is also the same people who have been responcible for the deaths of the inocents due to their collective failures.
Posted by: Iain galloway, Stirling on 10:11am Mon 22 Oct 07
Local Authority cuts -- good -- let us hope for the day when the last planner is strangled with the guts of the last minority rights officer and both interred with the remains of last social work manager -- but I guess that ,as said ,nobody would notice .
Posted by: Colin B, Bearsden on 10:21am Mon 22 Oct 07
Fife needs to tackle its chronic Absenteeism - Julie McLeish, Henry's wife ( an anti social social worker surprise surprise) , hardly worked- Fife Council is in the pocket of Unison and its police force is corrupt eg Stephen Johnson case
Posted by: alan reid, NZ on 11:08am Mon 22 Oct 07
Check how the English view the way the SNP govern Scotland, really it's time.
Wonder what Mrs Alexander would say about this?

http://www.telegraph
.co.uk/news/main.jht
ml;jsessionid=CJXFVN
PBKKQWRQFIQMFCFF4AVC
BQYIV0?xml=/news/200
7/10/22/nscot122.xml
Posted by: GILLEIBHINN on 11:08am Mon 22 Oct 07
The councils are working with last years settlement which was Jack s responsibility -together with the massive PFI sting constitutes a pretty sour inheritance for the SNP.There is nothing new about councils building projects -twas always the case before Maggie and Alastair the PIper and Peter of the mushy peas fame created Labour Nouveau
Posted by: Marga, Fife on 12:30pm Mon 22 Oct 07
- Jim, I'm afraid you may be right certainly as regards the elderly and home care departments in Fife. Our family’s perhaps unfortunate experience of this service (theoretically, comprehensive and generous) was that it was sadly not so in practice.
Certainly, what it did in our case was throw money at problems often without really addressing the issue, with incompetence and/or time-serving from supervisor and client contact level upwards.
A lot of misery could have been avoided and probably money saved all round if they had even managed to coordinate properly with other services and voluntary sources of help.
In other words, a system in a difficult area that had allowed itself to become institutionalised and self-perpetuating, I suspect at least partly due to mediocre and ingrown management.
People who had been promoted for various dubious reasons (Jim, you seem to have some ideas here …) or innocents parachuted into a sclerotic system from other specialities who hadn’t got a clue, etc.
Sadly, the cuts seem to be hitting the victims, as usual.
Posted by: The History Man, glasgow on 1:21pm Mon 22 Oct 07
Ian

I hope somebody opens a big smelly abatoir next to a mobile phone transmitter next to a wild boozy night club all next to your house. Then maybe you will think that planners, erm, just might have a role.

As for your snide remarks about Social Workers, I hope there is no child abuse, abandoned weans, old confused punters that need sorted out, young crims that need an eye on em etc etc around you.

I have no idea if stirling needs a minority rights officer, but if it does, I hope it has one.
Posted by: Allan, Glasgow on 4:24pm Mon 22 Oct 07
Councils are over-manned monoliths. If there is a budget crisis then get rid of some staff as I am sure no one would notice in most cases. Why do we need 32 Chief Execs, Directors of HR etc etc??
Posted by: Bill Cameron, St Andrews on 4:54pm Mon 22 Oct 07
As a former employee of Fife Council, I can vouch for the fact that it was grossly over-staffed, inefficient and uneconomic. Any attempt to highlight the major failings were ignored and it certainly did your career no good. I was actually told by one departmental director that "councillors are'nt nterested in efficiency schemes if it means upsetting other departments. As for the Unison comment by Colin B., he is spot on. Unison officials were hand in glove with the most influential councillors.
Posted by: Tom McAlister on 7:25pm Mon 22 Oct 07
.
A few commentators on another article in the Herald ( right to buy ) had a very novel solution to council management and employees which if implemented would be a cause for rejoicing and erm best pratice, best value whatever.

Local authority public employees from the head shed downwards will by law, civil or otherwise give an account of all their actions and decisions relating to their public responsibilities. To explain the reasoning behind those actions and decisions based on what and from where. Naturally, there will be exemptions if medical or personal information relating to a third party would be of a sensitive nature but full transparency of council business is a must if they are to be held to account.

... and fiscal penalties enforced on who so ever in the public employ who has failed in their duty to us in their capacity of "doing in our name". No buts, ifs, or whatevers. Standards in these public organisations must be comparable to employees in whatever position of responsibility in other organisations outwith the pubic sector.

They are employees, full stop. They are therefor accountable to their employers and that means US.
.
Posted by: Alex Porter, Madrid on 8:02pm Mon 22 Oct 07
Easy peasy. Alex Salmond will defend jobs and services in local authorities. He will also get rid of all the waste and dead wood at the same time. This should all be fixed by around Wednesday lunchtime. Isn't it great to have an SNP government.

Pity we can't have one here in Spain where nations like Euskadi and Catalunya aren't allowed to have referenda on independence. Sometimes I wonder why I bother living here at all. Then I remember. I'm a hypocrite and proud of it.
Posted by: consistent on 8:22pm Mon 22 Oct 07
Tom McAlister wrote:
.
A few commentators on another article in the Herald ( right to buy ) had a very novel solution to council management and employees which if implemented would be a cause for rejoicing and erm best pratice, best value whatever.

Local authority public employees from the head shed downwards will by law, civil or otherwise give an account of all their actions and decisions relating to their public responsibilities. To explain the reasoning behind those actions and decisions based on what and from where. Naturally, there will be exemptions if medical or personal information relating to a third party would be of a sensitive nature but full transparency of council business is a must if they are to be held to account.

... and fiscal penalties enforced on who so ever in the public employ who has failed in their duty to us in their capacity of "doing in our name". No buts, ifs, or whatevers. Standards in these public organisations must be comparable to employees in whatever position of responsibility in other organisations outwith the pubic sector.

They are employees, full stop. They are therefor accountable to their employers and that means US.
.
The same should go for Westminster and Holyrood as well
Posted by: TheWiseOne, Glasgow on 10:28am Tue 23 Oct 07
Social Work Depts in every council absorb far too much of the taxpayer's money. They, like all do-gooders, have managed to convince people that their role is vital in society. Vital roles, such as monitoring child delinquents and helping members of our prison population and their families get financial and other types of assistance. They must be the only department that wants to see the crime rate figures rise. More miscreants, more social workers,
bigger department, more tiers of management, more promotion prospects.

Meanwhile, refuse collections are being cut, library hours reduced,
A. and E. Departments closing, etc, etc.

Perhaps if these came under the auspices of the SWD, we would see these services improve, not worsen.



Posted by: Casey Jones, on the Cannonball Express on 12:49am Wed 24 Oct 07
so time now to re-visit John Swinney's much criticised
assertion that we cant afford to spend a Billion Pounds
on a Grandiose Tramcar Sceme for Edinburgh.

Already the silly EARL airport rail underground
fiasco has been abandoned by Bank Manager,
Captain John Swinney-Manwaring, with howls of
protest from.......ONE Falkirk Labour MSP
who said "This will affect my Constituency"

Was the specky git, right after all. ?

Can a Socialist swallow their Party dogma in a humble pie.

Ye can't spend the same money twice, so hospitals
schools, libraries, or .... a grandiose infrastructure project.

Hmmm.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:




spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use