The head of a government agency was criticised last night after he apparently snubbed an invitation to appear before a Holyrood committee.
Malcolm Reed, the chief executive of Transport Scotland, was scheduled to appear before the Transport, Infrastructure and Climate Change Committee to give evidence on the government's plans to abolish tolls on the Forth and Tay bridges.
But he failed to appear, prompting an angry outburst from Green MSP Patrick Harvie, the committee convener.
Mr Harvie accused Transport Scotland, which is responsible for delivering the government's £3bn capital investment programme, of turning down its invitation at the eleventh hour and said he would be demanding answers from John Swinney, Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth, when he appears before the committee next week. He said: "I'm very disappointed at Transport Scotland's decision. To refuse an invitation to appear, at very short notice, is highly unusual and prompted great surprise from the committee.
"Several members expressed their concern and disappointment, and we will be writing to the minister to express this."
Mr Harvie added: "It is important to remember the parliament's committees have the authority to require witnesses to attend, but we're talking here about Scotland's transport agency - there is no reason why we should have to go as far as that.
"I'm sure that members will want to ask some very direct questions of the minister when he appears in front of the committee next week.
"It has been said it is for the minister to decide which of the government's officials give evidence, so I am sure that members will want to know whether or not the minister himself decided that Transport Scotland should not give evidence to the committee."
Liberal Democrat MSP Alison McInnes, another member of the committee, said she would also be seeking an explanation from Mr Swinney.
She said: "It must surely beg the question, what has Transport Scotland got to hide?"
Despite attempts to get a response from both the government and Transport Scotland last night, neither were able to provide a comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article