The Liberal Democrats were last night branded irresponsible by the Conservatives for proposing a policy of "earned legalisation" to stay in Britain for as many as 600,000 illegal immigrants.
Nick Clegg, the LibDems' home affairs spokesman, flagged up the initiative ahead of a debate on the issue of immigration at the party's annual conference in Brighton next month.
In a newspaper article, he called for Britain to have stronger border control. However, it was his reference to "earned legalisation" for illegal immigrants, which sparked a broadside from the Tories.
Mr Clegg wrote that neither Labour nor the Conservatives had anything to say about the large number of "irregular residents who live in a twilight world of illegality and exploitation". He asked if Labour and the Tories seriously proposed deporting all 600,000 individuals, implying such a policy would be impracticable.
"A route of earned legalisation should be made available to those who have lived here unauthorised for many years," argued Mr Clegg. "We should set stringent criteria - this is not a blanket amnesty - namely that the applicant should have lived in the UK for many years, should have a clean criminal record and should show a long-term commitment to the UK."
However, David Davis for the Tories responded by saying: "This is irresponsible because on the one hand it will encourage people to come here illegally as well as being unfair to those who have obeyed the law and tried to enter the UK legally."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article