Charlie Gordon, the former Glasgow City Council leader, is considering a bid to unseat Jack McConnell as Labour leader at Holyrood, if the former First Minister does not opt to stand down first.
The Glasgow Cathcart MSP has told friends he believes there should be a contest, and that he is willing to be a "stalking horse". However, it is understood he has little expectation of winning the leadership, and that the effect would be to draw other MSPs into such a race.
Contacted yesterday, Mr Gordon would say only that he has not ruled out standing to force a contest.
The prospect adds to the pressure on Mr McConnell to stand down or call a contest at which he can defend his leadership, in the wake of being ousted from office at the election in May.
Although MSPs are away from Holyrood during July and August, speculation within Labour circles has been stepped up after a weekend briefing that made it clear Mr McConnell is minded to announce he is standing down next month.
His official position is that he has not decided, and nor has he decided when he will make his plans clear. Some close to him say he is poised to quit, and hopes to secure a new role, likely to include a seat in the House of Lords. Yet it is also claimed he is facing pressure to remain in the post and retain party stability, possibly by forcing an election in an attempt to win a renewed leadership mandate.
That speculation has made a contest all but inevitable. Mr Gordon could pressure the party's Scottish executive to call a special conference, though Wendy Alexander, the front runner to replace Mr McConnell, could be the one to put down the minimum 10 MSP nominations to spark a challenge.
On the left of the party, Elaine Smith, convener of the Campaign for Socialism grouping within the Holyrood group, told The Herald that the party membership must be given a choice, unlike the replacement in the Westminster leadership of Tony Blair by Gordon Brown last month.
The Coatbridge and Chryston representative said MSPs must not act as "gatekeepers" the way MPs did in the Commons, giving so much backing to one candidate that no-one else can win enough nominations to take their case to the wider party. She supported the left-winger John McDonnell in his unsuccessful bid to challenge Mr Brown. However, she ruled herself out as a left-wing candidate for the leadership.
One of those who could take up the left-wing mantle in a battle for the leadership could be Cathy Jamieson, who was a leading light in the Campaign for Socialism until she became a minister in 2002.
Apart from Wendy Alexander, the finance and sustainable growth spokeswoman, Andy Kerr, the health spokesman, is thought to be the second most likely candidate in a leadership contest. Margaret Curran, with the justice brief, is understood to be considering whether to stand.
A further significant figure is Iain Gray, the former enterprise minister until losing his Edinburgh seat in 2003, and then returning as East Lothian MSP in May. He could pitch to remove the party from the domination of Strathclyde, and try to win back the ground it has lost in the east and the rural parts of the country. He could also call on support from Westminster, where he has been working as a special adviser for Alistair Darling, now the Chancellor, and for Douglas Alexander when he was Scotland Secretary.
Labour rules allow a challenge to the Holyrood leadership at the annual conference, due next February, unless the party's Scottish executive responds to at least 10 MSPs nominating a challenger and calls a special conference before then. In such a contest, one-third of the voting college is decided by MSPs, MPs and MEPs combined, one-third by constituency members, and one-third by trade union affiliates.
Ms Alexander is seen as being ahead because she has put in the planning groundwork, with support expected from the Prime Minister and from trade unions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article