Disquiet over Tory leader David Cameron's European policy surfaced among senior party figures yesterday as he faced a double-pronged assault over calls for a referendum on the new EU treaty.
Former Chancellor Kenneth Clarke said referendum demands had "an inner absurdity" and argued that moving away from Euroscepticism would boost Tory electability.
Mr Cameron claims the treaty, expected to be finalised later this year, preserves much of the planned EU constitution, rejected by Dutch and French voters in 2005 and has accused the government of breaking a promise to hold a referendum and of handing powers to the EU without permission from the public.
Conservatives renewed demands for a referendum after Irish foreign minister Dermot Ahern said it was "likely" a public vote would be held there. Speaking on GMTV's Sunday Programme, the strongly pro-European Mr Clarke advised: "One thing that will make a Conservative Party electable will be if we continue to dilute this absurd, extreme Euroscepticism that swept over the party in the last 10 years."
Mr Clarke, who chairs the party's democracy task force, continued: "I find the idea of a referendum on whether the Polish voting deal was the correct one and whether you should have a rotating presidency of the European Council has an inner absurdity."
Former Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd told the programme referendums should be reserved for "the most extraordinary earthquakes which are proposed", adding: "I don't think there's anything in this treaty in so far as we can see it now which actually justifies that."
But he hailed Mr Cameron for "draining the poison" out of the European issue for Tories.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article