The Scotland Office has indicated that it is willing to change the law to let the Holyrood election inquiry see the thousands of ballot papers which were spoiled on May 3.
Concerns have been raised that the inquiry, under the leadership of the Canadian election expert Ron Gould, may be toothless because it has no statutory powers to order the release of the 142,000 discarded ballots.
But The Herald has learned that the Scotland Office would be willing to introduce a piece of secondary legislation at Westminster which would allow the spoiled papers to be made available.
A spokesman for the Scotland Office said: "It's not for the Scotland Office to comment on the form the independent review should take.
"We have repeatedly stated we will co-operate with the review and will deal thoroughly with any requests as and when they emerge."
Meanwhile, a lawyer who attempted to raise a court action against the result of the election in the Glasgow regional list today says only the very rich are able to pursue such a case under the current legal set-up.
Mike Dailly, principal solicitor at Govan Law Centre, believes either the Greens or Tommy Sheridan's Solidarity could have gained an extra seat in the city but for the confusion which surrounded the ballot papers.
Under the Representation of the People Act, a candidate or voter is able to challenge the result of a parliamentary election by petitioning the Court of Session within 21 days - a deadline that expired last week.
Writing in The Herald today, however, Mr Dailly describes that right as "illusionary" because the Legal Aid board will not provide financial assistance for such cases.
Democracy is loser Page 15
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article