Scotland's voting "fiasco" means there are MSPs in Holyrood who should not be there, MPs were told yesterday.
The point was made during a two-hour House of Commons debate on the running of the May 3 poll in which a Tory call for an inquiry, independent of the Electoral Commission which is currently conducting one, was defeated.
Members from all sides decried the running of the election, saying it had brought discredit to Scotland. David Hamilton, Labour MP for Midlothian, described the flawed process in which 146,097 votes were rejected as a "debacle", and noted: "There must have been parties who won, who should not have won."
Leading for the Conservatives, David Mundell described the rejected ballots as an "affront to democracy" and called on Douglas Alexander, the Scottish Secretary, to take full responsibility and apologise.
For the Liberal Democrats, Jo Swinson branded the Scottish elections "a fiasco from start to finish", flagging up the postal vote delays, spoilt ballot papers, abandoned counts and crashed technology.
Angus Robertson, the SNP's new leader in the Commons, referred to how First Minister Alex Salmond was "committed" to an inquiry taking place in Scotland, the details of which would be announced "in due course".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article