The economy of an independent Scotland would be helped by "fiscal fairy dust", according to the SNP economics spokesman.
Jim Mather also warned that an increase in income tax would be "naive" if the Scottish economy is to keep and attract knowledge workers - even though income tax bills would rise under the SNP with the replacement of council tax.
Labour, including Prime Minister Tony Blair, pounced on one of the election campaign's rare blunders, made during a media interview about Scotland's prospects under independence.
Labour's Wendy Alexander said the income tax admission had "holed the SNP's flagship taxation policy below the water line", and Tory deputy leader Murdo Fraser said it had "shot to pieces four weeks of careful Nationalist spin, confirming their sums don't add up".
The SNP claims its 3p in the pound local income tax would entail a large tax cut when compared with council tax bills, but Labour says it would make Scottish income tax the highest in Britain and drive people away.
By "fiscal fairy dust", Mr Mather suggested additions to a cut in corporation tax, such as an end to stamp duty on share sales, and altering tax law to attract investment funds.
An SNP spokesman claimed the Labour attack was "desperate and twisting comments out of context".
In the battle for business support, Jim Spowart, founder of Intelligent Finance, yesterday went public with his concerns about independence.
Appearing with Chancellor Gordon Brown, he said: "There's a big risk here and when we go into that voting booth it's very, very important that we put to bed once and for all this independence argument.
"We've been in a Union for 300 years which has done exceptionally well for people in Scotland and I don't see why a separate route would actually deliver something better."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article