JACK McConnell yesterday branded the SNP "sham environmentalists," stressing that the Nationalists' economic policies would only serve to harm Scotland's environmental wellbeing.
Speaking in Glasgow, Mr McConnell spelled out Labour's "hugely ambitious" green agenda and reiterated his government's record as "environmental leaders" over the past five years. His views were echoed by David Miliband, UK Environment Minister, who praised Scottish Labour's green record and raised similar doubts over the SNP's environmental pledges.
Mr McConnell said: "The SNP are sham environmentalists. They talk green but, locally and nationally, they act against environmental interests."
He stressed that under a Nationalist government, ordinary families would face higher energy bills. He said: "Their plan to take Scotland out of the UK would separate Scotland from the British energy market and the economies of scale that pay for grid infrastructure - making their protestations on renewable energy so much hot air."
"Labour has offered environmental leadership and a high level of ambition, not pie-in-the-sky promises that would lead to higher taxes. Our targets are ambitious by any standards - but we know they are achievable."
Mr McConnell again emphasised it would be "irresponsible" to categorically promise against the renewal of Scotland's nuclear power stations, given their importance to the nation's energy supply.
Mr McConnell's environmental credence was boosted by Mr Miliband, who revealed that upon their first meeting in the mid-1990s, Mr McConnell gave him the impression of a "green" politician, "before it was fashionable." He later added: "Or at least, red-green."
He too derided the SNP's apparent contradiction in policies. He said: "While every other country around the world is trying to reduce its addiction to oil, the SNP is addicted to it."
Meanwhile, Mr Miliband stated his unequivocal support for Gordon Brown's leadership of the Labour Party in a bid to stop speculation about his own leadership ambitions. He said: "I will be voting for Gordon Brown as Labour leader. He's the best-qualified."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article