Scotland's union leaders have called for the country's railways to be returned to public ownership and control.
Rail unions yesterday called for a renationalisation of the railways and said Network Rail taking over train operations would be a good first step.
Their call comes just a week after The Herald revealed a private meeting had taken place between a senior Network Rail official and a senior Labour politician at which the subject was discussed. At the Scottish Labour Party conference in November last year, the pair discussed the possibility of Network Rail establishing an operating division to run the ScotRail franchise on a not-for-profit basis when the current deal runs out in 2011.
The STUC annual congress, meeting in Glasgow yesterday, backed the renationalisation call which was made by three major transport unions, the RMT, Aslef and TSSA.
Congress voted unanimously to issue "support for renationalisation of the railways".
The motion also said: "Only a fully integrated transport system, run wholly in the public interest, can fully meet Scotland's needs and this motion urges the Scottish Executive to ensure Scottish rail passenger services are run on a not-for-profit basis."
While stating his support for the motion, Bob Crow, the RMT leader, launched an attack on Jack McConnell, Scotland's First Minister, who a day earlier had addressed the congress asking them to stick with Labour.
Unions have been angered over the role of government during recent disputes.
Mr Crow said: "It was a disgrace. Jack McConnell came here looking for our support, but over the last eight years has attacked workers for going on strike.
"They have had opportunities to support us but instead look at us like a concrete necklace round their necks."
Mr Crow added: "A not-for-profit Network Rail running trains would be a first step, but we want railways under public control. It is not democratically controlled just now. It is funded by the taxpayer but they have no real say in how it is run."
The congress called for the Scottish Executive to ensure greater public accountability and integration of track and train operations.
Chris Barrie, of Aslef, said: "There has been a failure of rail privatisation. Millions of pounds of taxpayers' money is being invested in the rail industry and then being slipped into the pockets of wealthy shareholders of private firms.
"Surely a publicly owned and publicly operated Network Rail is the first step to an integrated transport network for Scotland."
The RMT challenged the SNP over the lack of a commitment to public ownership of the railways and for accepting donations from the director of a major private transport firm. Bob Crow also dismissed reports of the RMT backing the SNP as "complete nonsense".
Later yesterday, the union voted against an STUC statement endorsing Labour at the election.
Mr Crow said: "In 2003 the SNP said that passenger train services across Scotland should be taken under public control through a not-for-profit trust.
"At a time when public opinion and many of the political parties in Scotland, including Labour, are recognising that Scotland's railways should be run in the interests of passengers and not shareholders, the SNP are taking a step backwards."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article