Rival Christian parties clashed yesterday over proposals for a referendum on the death penalty and the suggestion that prisons should be built in third world countries to take Scottish inmates.
The Scottish Christian Party not only wants a referendum on bringing back hanging, it has radical ideas for solving the current overcrowding in Scottish prisons.
The party "believes that the much needed extra prison capacity should be purchased from developing countries for the purpose of catering for Scotland's medium security prisons." It states: "This should take the form of building state of the art prison facilities in developing countries that wish to host Scottish prisons."
Advantages would include: "Less overcrowded prisons, cheaper costs and greater efficiency. More resources at home to look after our worse offenders properly. More economic trade instead of aid handouts to developing countries. Raising prison standards in developing countries by example and the provision of expertise."
The Rev George Hargreaves admitted he was "thinking out of the box" as he said of his Scottish Christian Party vision: "If we can export our call centres to the far east and take our rubbish to the far east, we could deal with prison overcrowding by sending it overseas. Why not take our lemons and make lemonade for someone else?"
The Scottish Christian Alliance, from which Mr Hargreaves broke away, were appalled by his ideas. "We are absolutely against capital punishment as we are a pro-life party in every sense, and as for this overseas prisons idea, absolutely not, this is just crazy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article