John Reid last night became Britain's beefed-up homeland security czar after Tony Blair gave the go-ahead for the splitting up of the Home Office - enabling it to focus more on the "people's priorities" of fighting terrorism, organised crime and illegal immigration.
The Home Secretary told MPs the move was aimed at creating a "step change in our approach to managing the terrorist threat to the UK and to winning the central battle which is the struggle for values and ideas".
In a written statement, the Prime Minister made clear he wanted to strengthen the Secretary of State's role in fighting crime and terrorism. "The continuing and growing threat from terrorism means that the government must develop and improve its counter-terrorism and security capabilities and its governance," he said.
Under the changes, a slimmed-down Home Office will retain responsibility for policing, antisocial behaviour, drugs, crime reduction, immigration and asylum as well as domestic security and counter-terrorism.
A new Ministry of Justice, from May 9, will handle the overall criminal and civil justice system, including courts, prisons and probation as well as constitutional reform. The current Department for Constitutional Affairs, which includes the Scotland Office, will be subsumed into the new ministry.
Among the changes, the Home Office will absorb counter-terrorism strategy from the Cabinet Office with the creation of a new strategic nerve centre, employing up to 300 people to co-ordinate a cross-departmental response to fighting the terrorist threat. A new ministerial committee on security and terrorism, to be chaired by Mr Blair, will also be established.
While some politicians and organisations, such as Napo, the probation union, welcomed the changes, particularly the creation of a Justice Ministry, others were more critical. Tory leader David Cameron branded it a "mistake" and said his party would try to stop it. Charles Clarke, the former Home Secretary, called the split an "irresponsible decision".
The changes come after a torrid year for the Home Office, hit by a series of controversies including the foreign deportation scandal. Last year, Mr Reid famously declared the country's immigration service was "not fit for purpose".
In the Commons, he told MPs the departmental changes were needed to meet the changing nature of the threats Britain faced.
"Along with the fight against crime and antisocial behaviour, the Home Office will be refocused towards the challenges of today's world and focus on the priorities of today's people."
He stressed Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett would retain control of MI6 and Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly would keep her responsibilities for community cohesion.
Mr Reid also made clear he would "of course, consult with Cathy Jamieson on this to make sure we have a seamless and integrated response in all these areas as is possible given the autonomy, in many areas, of the Scottish Executive".
Shadow Home Secretary David Davis, however, was unimpressed by the changes. He said: "Breaking it up will solve none of the Home Office's problems. It will just create a whole new raft of problems.
"Because of the way it has been done, the creation of a Department of Justice and a Department of Security will leave public security undermined and a justice system overwhelmed."
He added officials would be "distracted" by the massive reorganisation, rather than concentrating on current issues such as combating terror, overflowing prisons and immigration.
Last night, the Scottish National Party focused on the fate of the Scotland Office, which will come under the umbrella of the new Justice Ministry.
Pete Wishart, the SNP's constitutional affairs spokesman, pointed out how the new department would deal primarily with criminal justice issues in England.
He said: "It looks like the Scotland Office has become a sub-branch of a sub- branch. What was once a great department of state appears to have been forgotten in a forced shake-up of the Home Office."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article