Creating a network of local power stations would be far more efficient and lead to lower carbon emissions than building new nuclear power stations, according to a report commissioned by Greenpeace.
Decentralising Scottish Energy concludes that generating heat and electricity close to where it is needed could remove the need for nuclear power, as well as being cheaper, less polluting and decreasing Scotland's reliance on gas.
The report also says this approach would work well alongside a policy of harnessing Scotland's large-scale renewable energy potential.
The study by the World Alliance for Decentralised Energy argues that the current model across the UK relies on a few large power stations creating electricity miles away from the point of consumption. This method, developed in the 1930s, is so inefficient that two-thirds of the energy in the fuel is lost through power station cooling stations or as it passes along the grid.
Smaller, local stations can feed local combined heat and power schemes and sent the electricity shorter distances along the grid, saving 8% in carbon emission, cutting gas consumption by a similar abound and costing £1.8b less than building new nuclear plants.
Robin Oakley, Greenpeace's energy expert, said: "This is the closest thing to an energy silver bullet for Scotland. Decentralising energy will give us cleaner, cheaper and more secure power in the future."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article