Council chiefs yesterday admitted there was no end in sight to the confusion over charges for free personal care.
It emerged on Thursday that local authorities may need to refund around £20m after overcharging the elderly for the cost of preparing food in their homes.
Edinburgh City Council is next week expected to agree to a one-off payment of £2.1m to 820 people it overcharged, after taking legal advice.
However Cosla, the council umbrella organisation, said that without a definitive ruling from a court or a funding deal with ministers there would continue to be a patchwork of charging policies round the country.
Eric Jackson, spokesman for Cosla, said he hoped Edinburgh's decision would goad the Scottish Executive into action and resolve the issue.
The confusion stems from the 2002 act which introduced free personal care for the elderly, which said councils could charge for some additional care in the home, but explicitly ruled out charging for food preparation.
Attempts to define what is meant by food preparation have failed, with different councils interpreting the phrase in different ways. For example, some charge for making tea, others do not.
In 2004, the executive even admitted its own guidance on the matter was inconsistent with the law passed in 2002.
Frustrated by the confusion, Edinburgh council obtained its own legal opinion, which has said it was acting beyond its powers in charging for food preparation.
Mr Jackson said Edinburgh's example did not necessarily force other councils to follow suit, as there were different legal opinions on the issue.
"It's frustrating for everybody, because what want to do is look after people in our own areas. There needs to be clarity and perhaps this will act as a spur."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article