A key part of flagship legislation on child protection is being ditched to salvage the main part of the law and get it passed before the May election.
While ministers press on with safety checks on hundreds of thousands of adults who work with children and vulnerable adults, they want to counter the perception that risk assessments are nonsensical and getting out of control. They admit there is a need to reassure the public that they can still help with a school dance, sponsored walk or walking children to school.
Executive ministers have bowed to pressure from critics of the Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill, and have accepted significant changes are needed.
Robert Brown, Deputy Minister for Children and Education, will tell MSPs when they vote on the bill this week that the third section is being dropped. That would have placed a legal requirement on public agencies to share information on those who work with children and vulnerable adults to flag up warnings when they are at risk from people who pose a danger.
However, he says he is not able to meet back-bench demands to provide detailed plans for the workings of the vetting regime before the bill completes its passage through Holyrood in March.
The bill was introduced in response to the Soham murders of 2002. The Bichard Report found police and other agencies had failed to share information about school janitor Ian Huntley, who killed two schoolgirls. Legislation has been needed to plug the gaps for both Scotland and the rest of Britain.
Mr Brown hopes information will still be shared in Scotland without a legal requirement, and that MSPs after the election will add the measure to planned legislation reforming the children's hearings system. He intends to introduce a code of conduct for sharing information, even without the law requiring one.
Part three of the bill had not been put out to public consultation, and involved complex issues including patient and client confidentiality for doctors, sexual health workers and women's refuges. "It was threatening to foul up the whole thing," Mr Brown said. "The timing is tricky. There's no scope for slippage."
He is not giving ground on the issue of vetting of up to one-quarter of Scots adults, claiming the figures have been exaggerated.
It has been described by critics, including Children's Commissioner Kathleen Marshall, as overkill, creating an expensive bureaucratic burden on voluntary groups and discouraging adults from offering to work with children.
Mr Brown says there is a need to address the perception that vetting and safety requirements for working with children are disproportionate to the risk.
He said he wants to counter this with clear guidance about what the law requires. "There's no doubt the issue of people being put off more hazardous outdoor activities and the lack of volunteers coming forward are things we've got to get right," the minister said. "We need to take action to try to restore a bit of balance."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article