John Reid appeared to have won at least a stay of execution for his ministerial team over the criminal records fiasco last night although opposition MPs insisted that key documents at the centre of the row should be published.
Question marks remained over how much the ministers knew but there seemed to be general agreement that they had not been alerted to the scale of the backlog.
Senior MPs queried the robust denials from the Home Office when the blunder first hit the headlines on Tuesday night: they argued that ministers should not have taken to the airwaves without being totally aware of the fine print of all the correspondence.
Terry Davis, the secretary-general of the council of Europe, stepped into the argument yesterday to insist that Mr Reid, the Home Secretary, should not blame Europe for the criminal records backlog because the origins of the problem were in London.
The Home Office refused to publish the letters between the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) and ministers, which relate to the controversy but opposition parties are determined to pursue the correspondence.
They lodged Freedom of Information Act applications for publication of the letters sent between Acpo and Tony McNulty and Joan Ryan, the two ministers most closely involved in the controversy, three months ago.
Mr Reid has insisted they will not be released while an internal inquiry - expected to take six weeks - is under way.
Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, accused Mr Reid of "hiding behind the skirts" of junior minister Ms Ryan.
David Davis, the shadow home secretary, said: "It is long past time the public had straight answers and all correspondence was published."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article