logo
   Web Issue 3271 October 13 2008   
spacer




Anti-smoking lobby’s mild praise
ALAN MACDERMIDMarch 21 2007

The cut in VAT for nicotine patches and gum was welcomed by anti-smoking campaigners, but they felt the Chancellor could have turned the screw on cigarettes a bit further.

They described the inflation-linked 11p rise on packs of 20 cigarettes as a missed opportunity.

Maureen Moore, chief executive of Ash Scotland, praised the Chancellor's decision to reduce the VAT on nicotine replacement products, from 17.5% to 5%, although she was disappointed it was only for one year.

"Seven out of 10 smokers say that they want to quit. The announced price cut will assist in making smoking cessation a more achievable goal for all smokers," she said.

"But today's announcement does not go far enough to make cigarettes less affordable. Raising the price of cigarettes has been proven to reduce the number of children that become addicted to tobacco, as well as raising the number of smokers who choose to either cut back or quit.

"Research shows that a 10% increase in the price of cigarettes results in a 4% fall in tobacco consumption. This Budget was an opportunity for Gordon Brown to take targeted action aimed at reducing smoking, and Ash Scotland is disappointed he decided to pass up the opportunity to do more."

The British Medical Association also criticised the inflation-linked price rise on packs of cigarettes. Dr Sam Everington, deputy chairman, said: "Reducing the VAT on nicotine replacement therapy is a good way of actively encouraging people to quit smoking.

"However, we are very disappointed the Chancellor didn't go further and increase the duty on tobacco beyond the rate of inflation."

The smokers' lobby group, Forest, attacked the tax concession for replacement therapies. Spokesman Neil Rafferty said: "People choose to smoke. If they choose to quit, they should not be subsidised by the rest of the population. This is great news for the pharmaceutical industry but bad news for the British taxpayer."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: Rogers, Dayton, OH on 12:23am Thu 22 Mar 07
The smoking ban has gone way to far. Secondary smoke is so diluted
that it has little effect on anyone in spite of what the Crusaders
are trying to tell you. For every study that claims secondary smoke
is harmful, there are ten that say it is not.

80% of cancers due to poor air quality are caused by diesel
emissions. Coffee contains 1000 chemicals 16 of which are found in
rat poison. Airborne concentrations of carcinogenic alcohol is up to
2,000 times as great as their exposure to the combination of all
human carcinogens present in secondary smoke. We ingest more on
average 10,000 chemicals with our daily food intake.

Chemicals, germs, dust mites are a part of our existence.

You would have to sit in a room with a smoker smoking 165,000
cigarettes to be exposed to as much arsenic as you would get in a
large glass of water.

The anti-smoking crusaders are doing what is called social
engineering in much the same way that Hitler used it to de normalize
the Jewish population and quarantine them from the mainstream of
society. Please put some perspective into your thoughts regarding
this issue.

The Robert Woods Johnson Foundation has funded the anti-alcohol
movement 265 BILLION over the last four years in an effort to
stigmatize and eventually ban alcohol. This is the same organization
that has funded the anti-smoking groups. All of the above can be
verified upon your request.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Rogers
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:




spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use