Chelsea face London neighbours Charlton Athletic on Saturday afternoon at Stamford Bridge.
Both teams have benefited by differing degrees from a two week break in the Premiership programme as a result of European qualifying matches. However, the Charlton manager Alan Curbishley could have used the time more effectively than his counterpart at Chelsea Gianluca Vialli.
Curbishley has had a rare opportunity to coach his players for an extended period without being hampered by the worry of playing competitive matches. Vialli will not have had the same luxury as many of his charges have been away on international duty.
The bonding and team spirit which Charlton have already demonstrated in the opening weeks of the season will only have been strengthened by the time they will have spent together on the training ground. Charlton have acquitted themselves well so far this term, most notably with draws away at Anfield and Highbury.
Vialli will have studied their form and know that they are a good unit who work hard for each other.
They will not be overawed when they visit Stamford Bridge as self-belief is high in the camp. Chelsea will only have a short time to prepare as a full squad for this match as some of the players are on international duty up until Wednesday evening.
Another concern for Vialli will be that the likes of Graeme Le Saux, who picked up a slight knock while playing for England against Bulgaria, will return injury free and fit to play.
It is the first time the two sides have met in the Premiership.
But both sides play attacking football so if the game goes true to form there should be several goals in the encounter.
Chelsea will feel they should take maximum points, but Charlton have already shown they are more than capable of upsetting the form book so the Blues can take nothing for granted.
Converted for the new archive on 30 June 2000.Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article