Palace bow out of the Premiership on Sunday against Sheffield Wednesday hoping to give their long-suffering fans one last hurrah.
Last week's 5-2 drubbing at the hands of Bolton had all the hallmarks of an end of season capitulation from an already relegated team. Up against a team still desperately fighting for their Premiership survival, Palace caved in in spectacular fashion despite fighting back after conceding early on. They led 2-1 thanks to stunning strikes from Marcus Bent and Dean Gordon but Bolton's need proved decisive and the home side hit back with two goals before the break to lead 3-2.
A miserable second period saw Palace concede a further two and leave coach Brian Sparrow to reflect on what he described as "a very disappointing" performance.
Even after losing their Premiership status, Palace still do not look like they have learnt from their mistakes and continued to demonstrate the schoolboy defending so prevalent throughout the season.
Palace will be hoping Ron Atkinson's Sheffield Wednesday will have nothing like as much fight about them on Sunday. They are already certain of their Premiership status after beating Everton 3-1 and could well blood a few youngsters. Meanwhile Palace know that they are also highly likely to finish rock bottom.
Anything but a win against West Ham last night would have made certain of that dubious honour. And even if they did win last night and do manage to beat the Owls, they would still have to rely on Barnsley losing their final game of the season.
Two victories would also give Palace their first back to back victories for the whole season while a win over Sheffield would also give the Eagles their first double of the season having won 3-1 at Hillsborough.
Converted for the new archive on 30 June 2000.Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article