Animal rights activists gathered for a candlelit vigil outside the National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill on Monday to mark the 4th international animal rights day.
"We have tried all the legal channels and they don't work," said 'Pam', an activist, who prefers not to give her real name. "If we can't get anywhere by democratic means then what alternative do we have?"
The NIMR claims animal experiments are an integral part of its work researching diseases such as TB, malaria and infertility. It says animals do not suffer unnecessarily and every year it receives millions of pounds in government funding and fees from commercial companies and the European Union.
'Pam' remained skeptical about the industry's willingness to reform itself. "Vivisection is quite a complicated business that involves a lot of money and is big business for breeders. I don't think they want alternatives," she said.
'Joanna', a student who has travelled from outside London to protest in Mill Hill, said: "I do think that changes will happen though, because more people are beginning to realise just how fraudulent animal research is."
'Guy', who has been protesting regularly at the institute for two years, said: "Animal acivists have received a bad press and are often branded as violent. However, people should realise that these are only a few extremists.
"You want to know about violence then you should ask the institute to let you in. What goes on in there, that's legal violence."
The NIMR declined to comment on the protest.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article