A fresh attempt will be made to resurrect the ferry service between Campbeltown and Ballycastle in Northern Ireland, which last sailed in 1999.
Stewart Stevenson, the Transport Minister, announ-ced yesterday that a new economic appraisal of the route would be undertaken. It followed talks with his counterpart in the Northern Ireland Executive, Nigel Dodds.
There have been repeated attempts to resurrect the service in the last eight years. Indeed, at least two firms were interested in tendering to operate an 11-month service when Peter Hain, the Northern Ireland Secretary, announced in October last year that he was withdrawing the £300,000 that Northern Ireland had been due to contribute for five years to the £1m a year annual subsidy of the service.
It was seen as a stick to beat the Sinn Fein and the Democratic Unionist Party into power sharing, as the ferry had cross-party support.
But during Alex Salmond's visits to Belfast in June and at the British Irish Council in July, Northern Ireland ministers indicated their willingness to take the project forward.
Mr Stevenson said yesterday: "Communities on both sides of the water have campaigned long and hard for the reinstatement of this service, believing it would bring economic and tourism benefits to the local communities involved and Scotland more widely. This appraisal will examine that case.
"Both governments are in agreement that the previous appraisals carried out in 2000/01 are now too old to be of any practical use in assessing the case for reintroducing the service, or estimating the associated costs and benefits involved. A new appraisal now will allow us to re-examine the economic viability of the route."
The appraisal, which will go out to tender within the next few days, should be completed this summer.
But Alan Reid, LibDem MP for Argyll and Bute, said: "For the ferry service to be properly marketed for 2009, contracts with an operator will have to be signed by next September at the latest. If this study is not completed by the summer, it will be too late."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article