A consumer watchdog's complaint which claims Scots are not getting sufficient access to affordable justice and legal representation has been condemned by a top solicitor.
Solicitor advocate Frank Maguire rejected claims by Which? that the current regulation of Scottish legal firms is hindering competition in the market, restricting choice and pushing up the price.
Writing in the latest edition of legal magazine The Firm, Mr Maguire, senior partner at Thompsons Solicitors, said the provision of legal services should not be governed by consumer law.
"Try telling families of the Stockline disaster, the recent tugboat tragedy on the Clyde, the husband of the family wiped out in a car accident from diesel spillage or someone dying from an industrial disease or infected with blood products that they are consuming justice.
"They are consuming nothing," he said.
"Their right to justice is the same as their right to education and health and it is the duty of society to uphold that right."
Under changes proposed south of the border, banks and supermarkets will soon be able to join forces with law firms to provide legal services.
But Which? says there has been little impetus for exploring, let alone implementing, alternative ways of doing business from the legal profession in Scotland.
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has upheld calls by Which? for a reform of the legal services market in Scotland, saying that the current regulatory regime is "restrictive" and harmful to consumers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article