logo
   Web Issue 3270 October 12 2008   
spacer




Asylum backlog ‘locks youngsters into years of fear’

NICOLA BODEN

An asylum backlog in the UK has condemned around 100,000 vulnerable children to years of poverty, uncertainty and fear, according to a leading children's charity.

New procedures introduced by the Home Office mean that families arriving in the UK to claim asylum will now be swiftly returned to their own country if their claim fails.

But Barnardo's, which welcomes these changes, says there is still a huge backlog of families unaffected by the legislation which could take up to 2011 to clear.

It argues that the current laws which prevent asylum seekers working in the UK mean they cannot support themselves and their children.

The charity wants the backlog to be dealt with urgently and for any parents who are in the UK for longer than six months to be allowed to work to support their families.

Its report Like Any Other Child? discovered that some asylum seekers had to wait up to 10 years before their cases were resolved.

It also revealed that their children faced "shocking" disadvantages due to their parents' small benefits allowance, often living in damp and unsafe housing, suffering "aggressive racial abuse" and frequently having to move schools.

Asylum seekers also had to live for years without knowing whether they would be forced to leave the UK and take their children back to countries they might never have known.

Kirsi, 29, fled to the UK from Kenya in 2004 after being tortured by rebels because they wanted information on her husband who was involved in a land rights dispute.

She and her son Daniel, three, now live in a damp, overcrowded flat in a Glasgow tower block and struggle because, although Kirsi is a trained accounts clerk and has since attained a Scottish computer qualification, she is not allowed to work.

"The longer my application takes, the more chances I miss. I want to be contributing to society and providing a better life for Danny, but I am forced to rely on benefits," she said.

Barnardo's, which is officially launching its report today, is calling on the Home Office to re-address the current asylum process and focus on children's needs.

It also suggests the families should not be put in an area with a history of harassment.


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: lulzim, cardiff 996828 on 1:38pm Mon 7 Jan 08
i think all children born in uk should be aloud to stay. i think is unfare for children to be trited like slaves by raisists of the country
Posted by: Brian, West Fife on 11:39am Tue 8 Jan 08
If some one has problems in the part of Kenya where they live they should perhaps relocate to another part of Kenya, or failing that go to the nearest safe country to Kenya. I can't see why the UK should entertain an application for asylum from such a person, or an application for asylum from anyone else who could have gone to a safe country nearer their country of origin.

They were said to live in a "damp, overcrowded flat in a Glasgow tower block", many indigenous Glaswegians live in such flats, is that not equally a scandal? Who is fighting for them?

Barnardo's " ... also suggests the families should not be put in an area with a history of harassment."

I don't condone harassment, but if it is as prevalent as some people make out (I've read that it is not always white harassing non-white), where will these people go? How much extra (scarce) public money will this cost? If there is an instance of harassment (even just perceived harassment) will they get moved again?

Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:




spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use