A series of problems and misunderstandings contributed to the Bourbon Dolphin disaster, which claimed eight lives when the oil-rig support tug capsized 75 miles north-west of Shetland in April.
Among them was a failure of an emergency release mechanism - or failure to operate it properly - which should have disengaged the anchor chain attached to the Transocean Rather oil rig which dragged the boat over on its side.
Although this came late in the sequence of events which contributed to the disaster, it is thought a faster emergency release may have averted it.
There was also confusion over which direction another anchor-handling vessel should have been pulling the chain in what was meant to be a routine anchor-laying procedure. Eight of the 15 Norwegian crew, including a father and his 14-year-old son died in the tragedy.
Only three bodies were recovered.
The Norwegian Justice and Police Minister, Knut Storberget, appointed a five-strong commission to investigate the cause of the tragedy off Shetland and is due to report in full on February 1, 2008.
Among the commission's interim recommendations are improving knowledge of the emergency release system on the winch.
It is thought that the button that triggers the release may not have been depressed long enough by the crew members.
The commission also called for more information about boat stability and better regulations covering anchor-laying procedures involving more than one boat working in tandem.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article