A coroner recommended a war crime investigation early today after ruling that five Australian-based journalists, including a Scot, were deliberately killed during an Indonesian invasion of East Timor more than 30 years ago.
The finding followed an extensive inquest which contradicted the official version of events by Australian and Indonesian governments which concluded that the journalists were killed accidentally in crossfire involving Indonesian troops and East Timorese defenders on October 16, 1975.
New South Wales state Deputy Coroner Dorelle Pinch, investigating the death of one of the journalists Brian Peters, found that he was "shot and/or stabbed deliberately, and not in the heat of battle, by members of the Indonesian Special Forces ... to prevent him from revealing that Indonesian Special Forces had participated in the attack on Balibo".
Mr Peters, a British cameraman, had gone to East Timor with Malcolm Rennie, 29, from Barrhead, Renfrewshire, who was on his first foreign assignment for an Australian television network.
Ms Pinch said her findings relating to Mr Peters would be the same for the other journalists. She said war crimes may have been committed under Australian law and said she was referring the case to federal prosecutors to determine whether war crime charges could be brought.
Secret documents released in 2000 showed the Australian government knew in advance of the East Timor incursion and stood by for three days while Jakarta's troops prepared for it.
An invasion two months later led to 24 years of brutal Indonesian rule in East Timor.
Early this morning Mr Rennie's cousin, Margaret Wilson, speaking from her London home, said: "Hopefully this brings us a step closer to securing justice for Malcolm and his colleagues."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article