Erratic planning decisions based on personal taste and party politics could drive away tens of millions of pounds in investment and open Scotland's largest local authority to legal action, senior sources claim.
The warning comes ahead of an application for a skyline-busting luxury hotel planned for the fringes of Glasgow city centre which some within the local authority fear could be refused because of its bold design.
It also follows the unexpected decision a fortnight ago to refuse permission for a 20-storey hotel on a rundown site on the edge of the city centre.
The bid, by the Staybridge Group, would have added 120 suites for long-stay visitors to Glasgow.
But opposition councillors and one Labour member voted against it. The authority's sole Tory, David Meikle, claiming it was "ghastly" and "hideous".
In a recent planning meeting the proposal to extend the Buchanan Galleries was described as "tacky".
Tomorrow, full planning permission is being sought for the six-star, 26-storey Argyle International Hotel, which will include 172 bedrooms, 68 apartments, a 24th storey swimming pool with a restaurant, bar and outdoor terrace on the floor immediately below.
If given the green light, it will occupy the corner of Argyle Street and Robertson Street and will help meet demand for luxury rooms in the city.
Officials and councillors are uneasy that potential developers will be turned off from investing in Glasgow.
Last night a senior Glasgow City Council source said: "It largely comes down to inexperience decisions are being made on the basis of personal taste.
"These are not competent grounds and don't send the right signals to investors who can legitimately take their money and go elsewhere."
But Mr Meikle refuted the claim that he, along with Green and Nationalist councillors were jeopardising future developments.
He said: "We shouldn't just approve for the sake of it.
"Our decisions are not politically motivated."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article