The timer which detonated the Lockerbie bomb was critical to the Crown case against Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi.
Much of the case was largely circumstantial but the prosecution argued that a small fragment of green circuit board found embedded within the charred remains of a shirt collar matched a distinctive model of electronic timer, known as the MST13.
The timers were designed and built by a small Swiss company called Mebo and, according to the prosecution, supplied solely to Libya.
The fragment was found by forensic scientist Dr Thomas Hayes of the Royal Armaments Research and Development Establishment, on May 12, 1989.
The trial court accepted the evidence given by one of the partners in that firm, Edwin Bollier, that in 1985 and 1986 he had supplied 20 sample MST13 timers to Libya. However, at least two of the same timers were also supplied to the East German Stasi secret police.
Doubt was cast at the original trial about the veracity of the forensic examination of the fragment, including the fact that the description on the label had been changed from "cloth" to "debris" and the alteration had not been signed.
The court transcript states: "On the evidence which we heard, we are satisfied that the explosive device which destroyed PA103 was triggered by an MST13 timer alone."
The court dismissed the possibility that the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, the original suspects in the case, had obtained such timers via their German cell.
Last month, The Herald revealed that the makers of the timer plan to travel to Scotland following the revelation that one of their employees planted vital evidence.
Ulrich Lumpert, formerly an electronics engineer with Mebo in Zurich, signed an affidavit admitting that he committed perjury before the Scottish Court in the Netherlands.
In his affidavit, he states that he stole a handmade sample of an "MST13 Timer PC board" from Mebo in Zurich and handed it over to an "official person investigating the Lockerbie case" on June 2, 1989.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article