CAMPAIGNERS took a tractor through some of Scotland's busiest streets yesterday in protest against the creation of a Muslim cemetery on the outskirts of a conservation village.
More than 1000 people had signed the petition against the burial ground which would consume 31 acres of green-belt land around Carmunnock, just six miles south of Glasgow city centre, effectively ending its status as a distinct village.
Protest leaders said the stunt with the tractor, which parked up outside the City Chambers for over an hour yesterday morning, was to highlight the impact of development on green belt land.
About 60 people, mainly mothers and young children, took part in the protest, with the petition handed over to a representative of Lord Provost Bob Winter.
Following the handover of their objections, campaign leaders again repeated their stance that they "respect and support the Muslim community's need to have a cemetery in the Glasgow area" and that this may even be found within Carmunnock. But they claim the need for an Islamic cemetery should not be at the expense of green belt and Carmunnock's village heritage.
Spokeswoman Tracey Crawford said: "Of course a cemetery would be prettier than housing or industrial development but if you build on this land you end Carmunnock's village status.
"The Muslim community say they have been offered no alternatives by Glasgow City Council. There is room alongside the current Carmunnock cemetery which we've no problem about being used.
"The protest at the City Chambers was to highlight the impact of development on village life. We thought a tractor in the city centre would focus some minds on how ridiculous this is."
Muslim leaders, including new Muslim Council for Scotland head Bashir Mann, have also continued to insist the land will remain green and picturesque.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article