Suicides among British veterans of the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan are running at more than 16% of total combat deaths, according to figures obtained by The Herald.
A total of 23 soldiers who served in the war zones have taken their own lives since 2003, compared to 153 killed by enemy action.
The British rate is also outstripping the incidence of suicides in the US Army, where only 25 veterans out of 140,000 soldiers deployed to Iraq are known to have killed themselves last year.
The UK deaths include six who killed themselves while deployed and 17 who took their lives after returning to their home bases.
The tally includes only those whose suicides have been confirmed by coroners or registered as open verdict deaths between January 2003 and December 2006 in Iraq and October 2001 and December 2006 in Afghanistan.
Colonel Clive Fairweather, former deputy commander of the SAS and Scottish fundraiser for Combat Stress, the military mental health charity, said there was no doubt the British Army was exposed to a lot more pressure as a result of fighting two simultaneous wars with limited manpower.
"We see soldiers exhibiting the first signs of post-traumatic stress within months of their return from Iraq or Afghanistan. It used to take years," he said.
David Orman, a psychiatrist consultant to the US Army on suicide prevention, said military suicides typically drop during combat, when troops "are very preoccupied with staying alive".
Meanwhile, in Iraq yesterday, a British soldier died of wounds in an attack on a military co-ordination centre in Basra It also emerged last night that the backlog of military inquests remains over 100 despite extra resources from the government to help the bereaved families.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article