A PRIEST whose lengthy battle to remain in his parish was taken to the Vatican has launched a tirade against the Catholic Church hierarchy.
Canon Denis Quinlan, one of the so-called "Galloway Three", said successive bishops in his diocese had forced his early retirement and he was still demanding a "full and unreserved apology" after almost 20 years of bitterness.
Canon Quinlan, along with Father Michael Lynch and Father Ralph Mancini, fought and won the battle to remain in their respective parishes after being ordered to move on by Bishop Taylor in 1990.
The Vatican ruled that the bishop had violated church law by ordering their transfer.
Canon Quinlan says he and the other priests then expected an apology and an explanation would follow but they never came, and he remains angry and frustrated at the treatment.
He said: "I will not let it go. What took place to myself and the others all those years ago was manifestly unjust and it is time those in charge acknowledged this and reinstated our good names.
"A transfer is a normal method of sending priests to other parishes, but this was a removal. And a removal is very sinister.
"The Church should practise what it preaches. The longer this has gone on the more pain and psychological harassment it produces."
He claims he also asked for assistance at St Joseph's RC Church and the lack of this forced his retirement through ill health. But since calling it a day in February three priests have now been allocated to the parish.
He added: "Next year would have marked my golden jubilee with the Catholic Church. But my health was suffering. The workload was too great for one man."
However, many within the Catholic Church believe the former Kilmarnock-based parish priest is refusing to let go of a row that was resolved in 1996.
They also claim that Catholic convention dictates that the only person who can apologise is former Bishop of Galloway Maurice Taylor, who is currently battling cancer.
A Catholic Church spokesman said: "The events described took place almost two decades ago. Bishop Taylor, now retired, has no wish to comment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article