The Ministry of Defence is seeking an amendment to the law to allow it to carry out criminal record bureau checks on the NCOs sent to train vulnerable Army recruits.
The move, a year after the Deepcut Review criticised aspects of the selection of training staff at depots, would allow the Army to bypass the Data Protection Act to vet the lance-corporals, corporals and sergeants who make up the majority of military instructors.
Anyone with a hidden background of violent bahaviour would be barred from duty supervising the 13,000-15,000 recruits aged 18 or under who enlist each year.
At the moment, employers can request checks on applicants hired to be responsible for under-age personnel, but not on employees already in full-time jobs. Most NCOs have between seven and 10 years' service at their ranks.
The MoD is opening a staff leadership school at Pirbright, Surrey next week to "train the trainers" and ensure that every NCO posted to a depot has been fully briefed on recruits' rights and vulnerabilities.
Part of the course deals with a ban on the informal physical punishments handed out in the past to recruits deemed not to be trying hard enough. Typically, these ranged from verbal abuse to exhausting extra drills, runs or push-ups.
The MoD said yesterday: "The new policy defines what is legitimate to assist trainees to achieve required standards and to ensure that both instructors and trainees distinguish this from bullying or harassment.
"That is always unacceptable. Punishment may only be awarded as a result of a formal disciplinary process."
One of those who died at Deepcut was Private James Collinson, from Perth.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article