The debate intensified yesterday as the deadline passed for responses to the proposal to build 181 wind turbines on the island of Lewis.
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council) will almost certainly recommend approval but it will be up to ministers to take the final decision and they will not do so until after the Scottish parliamentary elections in May.
The protagonists are giving food for ministerial thought. Last week the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), which is opposed to the £400m development, challenged the developers' claims that the development would bring more than of 230 jobs.
Yesterday, developers Lewis Windpower, a partnership between Amec and British Energy, hit back. David Hodkinson, Lewis Windpower director, said: "It appears to us that RSPB's attempt to discredit the work we have commissioned in respect of the economic development potential of the wind farm is a sign of their desperation to shift the debate away from the bird interests that are at the heart of their charitable status and royal charter.
"We expect one of the reasons for this is their desire to conceal their inconsistent approach to the protection of red-throated divers.
"We estimate the risk posed by the wind farm, which RSPB says would have a catastrophic' impact on these birds, is a tiny fraction - less than 1% - of that posed by the offshore project in the Thames Estuary, which RSPB welcomed.
"We issue a challenge to RSPB to explain how they see this apparent economy with the facts fitting with their obligations as a charity."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article