The UN's damning report on global warming represents a massive blow to the collective dubbed "climate change deniers", according to Environment Secretary David Miliband.
Botanist David Bellamy, former Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel Lawson, scientists Pat Micheals and Dick Lindzen in the US, and weather forecaster Piers Corbyn in the UK have all claimed in recent articles and speeches that carbon dioxide is not responsible for the increase in global temperatures.
Mr Bellamy claimed in 2004 that the theory of man-made global warming was "poppycock" and argued the following year that instead of shrinking, as most scientists believed, the world's glaciers were advancing.
He famously asserted that "the link between the burning of fossil fuels and global warming is a myth".
In 2005, Mr Lawson wrote a letter to The Times criticising the Kyoto protocol and claiming that there were substantial scientific uncertainties surrounding climate change.
Mr Miliband said: "It is another nail in the coffin of the climate change deniers and represents the most authoritative picture to date, showing that the debate over the science of climate change is well and truly over."
Alan Thorpe, chief executive of the Natural Environment Research Council, said that "a handful of scientists, politicians and writers are still claiming humans are not responsible at all; we have got to kill off this notion so we can get on with the real work - protecting ourselves from future climate change".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article