The Catholic Church was yesterday accused of attempting to blackmail the government after warning its adoption agencies could close in the face of new gay rights legislation.
Two Scottish Catholic adoption agencies - St Andrew's Children's Society in Edinburgh, and St Margaret's Children and Family Care Society in Glasgow - are among those which could close if new legislation forcing them to accept adoption by gay couples is introduced.
Roman Catholic bishops in Scotland yesterday added their voice to calls for Prime Minister Tony Blair to exempt Catholic adoption agencies from being compelled to place children with same-sex couples.
Mario Conti, the Archbishop of Glasgow, sent a letter to the Prime Minister by fax on behalf of Scotland's Catholic bishops. He will also write to Scottish First Minister Jack McConnell asking him to uphold assurances which he said were given to the Church by the Scottish Executive that they would not expect Catholic agencies to act contrary to their beliefs.
The archbishop's action came as secular and gay rights activists accused Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, the leader of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, of using "blackmail" in a bid to secure exemptions from the government.
The cardinal has urged ministers to avoid the "unnecessary tragedy" of the Church's adoption services closing. He wrote to cabinet ministers saying Church teaching prevented its agencies placing children with homosexuals.
Last night he said: "I'm not blackmailing anybody. I am just saying to the government the possible consequences of carrying through those particular regulations."
In his letter, Archbishop Conti, who is vice president of the Bishops' Conference, wrote: "The Catholic Bishops of Scotland express their support for the position taken by Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor."
The row is said to have split the cabinet. Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly, who is Catholic, is reported to be pushing for an exemption.
Peter Tatchell, of the gay human rights group OutRage, claimed Mr Blair's "equivocation" on the issue was giving "comfort and encouragement to homophobes".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article