Anti-social behaviour orders (Asbos) have been in force since 1998, but in 2004 the measures were extended to include children.
The legislation pledged to improve lives for communities plagued by gangs, noise and nuisance by invoking Asbos or dispersal zones.
In September 2005, a 14-year-old became the first child in Scotland to receive an Asbo after terrorising a community. The teenager, from Renfrewshire, was banned from entering certain areas, from assaulting or endangering others, using threatening words or actions, damaging other people's property or entering land without being invited.
Two months later, the village of Mid Calder in West Lothian was turned into a dispersal zone to prevent gangs of youngsters from roaming its streets.
It was the first move of its kind in Scotland on such a scale and gave police the powers to break up groups of two or more if they were causing alarm or distress to members of the public.
In June last year, Jack McConnell, First Minister, complained that councils and chief constables had not made enough use of the new powers.
He spoke of his "absolute dismay", saying it was "inexcusable" that they were failing to take advantage of the new legislation.
But figures published last month showed there had been a 24% rise in applications to courts for Asbos over one year.
In 2005/06, councils applied to the courts for 309 Asbos and social landlords for 35, with five of the 32 local authorities - Dundee, North Lanarkshire, Edinburgh, Fife and North Ayrshire - accounting for more than half of applications.
The number of Asbos which were granted more than doubled over two years, from 117 in 2003/04 to 255 in 2005/06.
In August last year, around 6581 people attended a roadshow on antisocial behaviour, which travelled to 16 locations from Greenock to Inverness. It resulted in 773 referrals to local agencies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article