logo
   Web Issue 3239 August 29 2008   
spacer
Anger grows over link-up plan for island health boards
DAVID ROSS, Highland CorrespondentJuly 04 2008

Island politicians last night vowed to oppose any attempt to merge their local health boards with larger mainland authorities.

Some see the Scottish Government's decision to form partnership agreements between Orkney/Shetland and Grampian, and Western Isles and Highland, revealed in The Herald yesterday, as the first step to merger.

Others in the islands have accepted ministers' assurances that the initiative is designed only to provide managerial and administrative support for the island boards, and will not undermine their autonomy.

However, Tavish Scott, the LibDem MSP for Shetland, was not persuaded. He saw the partnership arrangement as just the start of a centralising process that posed a threat to the autonomy of island authorities.

He said: "I think the SNP has decided that small doesn't work and the logic of that is that island health boards will be eventually subsumed into larger mainland authorities. The greater logic is that we will lose our island authorities to a Strathclyde writ large.

"We are having none of that. It is deeply worrying. It is also typical of the SNP that there has been no announcement in parliament and the news of this comes during the two months when ministers cannot be held to account by parliament. So I will be writing today to the Health Minister, demanding to know what's going on."

He said that Shetland was having to pay a price for serious management failures revealed in the Western Isles health board. "Problems elsewhere should not produce a one-size-fits-all approach to all the island health boards."

The news also caused concern in the Western Isles. Angus Campbell, vice-convener of Western Isles Council, said the council had anticipated closer integration of its services with those of the health board, rather than the board strengthening ties with mainland health authorities.

"There is still residual fear in some quarters about the long-term future of island health authorities and this proposed development only creates further uncertainty. The long-term aims of both organisations (council and health board) are to have effective joint service provision within the islands to ensure the best use of resources and services and retain maximum employment within the area."

Stephen Hagan, convener of Orkney Islands Council, shared those concerns. "We have a solid relationship with NHS Orkney and have been engaging in constructive discussions on shared services. We hope that the proposed partnership arrangements will help to strengthen the board's management and enhance its independent status."

But island health boards had a different perspective. Sandra Laurenson, chief executive of the Shetland board, said: "We are supportive of the proposal in principle. We already work closely with Grampian on clinical services, so we can see the benefit of working together on support services. We are very pleased the independence of our board has been confirmed."

Orkney NHS also welcomed the proposal and did not see it as any threat to its own independence.

A statement from NHS Western Isles said Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon had reaffirmed on her visit to Benbecula on Tuesday that the board would continue to exist independently. "The purpose of establishing stronger formal partnerships would be to strengthen the capacity in the Western Isles - not to dilute it."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: para handy, brittany, France on 9:34pm Thu 3 Jul 08
Just a wee touch of bias in this article - the story leads with island politicians fighting a supposed merger and health boards ( surely the ones with their eyes closest to the ball) seeing no threat to their independence.

Has the Herald taken leave of its senses and taken out membership of the Tavish Scott fan club?

No wonder the Nats get scunnered, given standards of reportage like this.....
Posted by: gavin48, Glasgow on 9:20am Fri 4 Jul 08
For heavens sake what is the Herald talking about? I am afraid this is too common an occurrence where there is a shock headline that the body of the story does not support. The story is largely filled by a spokesman from an opposition party making wild and unsupported claims, that are then presented as facts. Buried in the story is comments from people directly effected which are completely at odds with the tone and timber of the rest of the article.
The actual story is about sensible partnership arrangements between some of our smallest Health Boards with larger ones, building on current arrangements, the Health Boards involved are very relaxed about it. As exemplified by the quote from one of the chief executives of one of the health boards.
But island health boards had a different perspective. Sandra Laurenson, chief executive of the Shetland board, said: "We are supportive of the proposal in principle. We already work closely with Grampian on clinical services, so we can see the benefit of working together on support services. We are very pleased the independence of our board has been confirmed."
Posted by: Ian Johnston, Castle Douglas on 9:29am Fri 4 Jul 08
The Western Isles have it coming - both the Health Board and the council (BCCI) there have been embarrassments for years. I have some sympathy for Orkney and Shetland, though, which have managed their affairs much more sensibly and are being tarred with the same brush.
Posted by: maddy, Isle of Lewis on 9:38am Fri 4 Jul 08
Hoorah!!!

As an NHS employee thank goodness we are not to come under the grasping small minded reign of the local authority. Just look at their position and what they will owe on education having paid off the BCCI debts.

How can anyone give credability to Councillors who just keep putting off schools decisions at increased project costs of £1 million every 6 weeks or so.

Yippee - we might have some sane, joined up thinking.
Posted by: c dition, Scotland on 6:48pm Fri 4 Jul 08
When we talk about Western Isles Health Board and branding 'them' as failures, who are we talking about? Western Isles Health Board is not a group of faceless people but nurses, physiotherapists, radiology staff, lab technicians, doctors, porters, domestic staff and managers who all work to extreemly high and exacting standards.

There are many examples of services in the Western Isles that are innovative ans set a lead for other areas in Scotland, that set a standard not achieved in other health boards including Highland and Grampian evidence of this is supported in the results of clinical reviews conducted by NHS Quality Improvement Scotland.

The failings that are being attributed to 'Western Isles Health Board' were not the failings of groups of people or whole systems but were the failing of just one or two people. An ex Chief Executive and ex Chairman in particular. Until there is a full and open investigation into those circumstances the public and staff will not fully understand what took place and how their conduct then is still having an impact on the service today.

It is regrettable that divides are opening between Orkney, Shetland and the Western Isles with members of the Scottish Parliament issuing statements like "He said that Shetland was having to pay a price for serious management failures revealed in the Western Isles health board. "Problems elsewhere should not produce a one-size-fits-all approach to all the island health boards." which can only breach the good relationships that the Scottish Islands have had with one another. Rather polititians and community leaders should be joining forces to insist on a public investigation and generate looking for ways to encourage public discussion on the best way to provide health care to remote and rural areas and to island communities in particular.

At a time when health services have a vital role to play in inward migration, investment and enterprise and in supporting sustainable communities in the islands, it will be nothing short of catastrophic to remove the authority for planning, finance and human resources from the islands. Without control of those strategic services there will be an impact that will affect islands communities for many decades to come. Local decision-making will be removed from the people those services are designed to support, in the communities they have chosen to live.

Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use